Search for: "Shaw v. Board of Administration" Results 41 - 60 of 106
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Data Protection and Data Privacy The Conseil d’Etat, the highest French administrative court, has sought a preliminary ruling from the CJEU on a series of questions concerning the implementation of the right to be delisted. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am by John Elwood
That’s all we have for the penultimate Relist Watch of the Obama Administration. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:16 am by Dennis Crouch
Shaw Industries Group, Inc., et al., No. 16-108 (Achates redux – review of statute-of-limitations for filing IPR requests) Safe Harbor: Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Social Media Social Media Law Bulletin has published an article about a case earlier in the year where a National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) administrative law judge found that an employee’s tweets could be considered protected “concerted activity”. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 5:15 am by Edith Roberts
United States and Shaw v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 3:14 am
Christopher Larkin has been appointed to the position of Administrative Trademark Judge at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 12:31 pm by Richard Hasen
The future of racial gerrymandering claims Finally, the future balance of the Court may determine what the Court does with the racial gerrymandering cause of action, which originated in the Supreme Court’s 1993 decision in Shaw v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 9:00 am by Dennis Crouch
” = = = = = Notes [1] Shaw Industries Group, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 9:26 am by Robert B. Milligan
Throughout 2015, Seyfarth Shaw’s dedicated Trade Secrets, Computer Fraud & Non-Competes Practice Group hosted a series of CLE webinars that addressed significant issues facing clients today in this important and ever-changing area of law. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 8:05 am by Joy Waltemath
Justice Shaw and Justice Bryan filed two separate opinions concurring in part and dissenting in part (Lambert v. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 11:56 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Seyfarth Shaw’s discussion of the ramifications of the Browning Ferris decision, for both unionized and non-unionized employers, is available here. [read post]