Search for: "Shaw v. Walker" Results 1 - 20 of 39
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2013, 5:46 am by Stephen Pitel
  But lower courts and academics have been working to understand the new framework for taking jurisdiction set out in April 2012 by the Supreme Court of Canada in Van Breda v Club Resorts (available here). [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 4:26 pm by Jon Sands
” He was prescient, as the Supreme Court held in Shaw v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Stein of Bilzin Sumberg on the firm’s blog, Mortgage Crisis Watch Construction Contract Requires Written Invoice Before Owner Must Pay Contractor: Kasinecz v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 4:39 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The plaintiff shareholder attempted to argue, in reliance on the First Circuit’s 1996 decision in Shaw v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 4:39 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The plaintiff shareholder attempted to argue, in reliance on the First Circuit’s 1996 decision in Shaw v. [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 2:43 am
Walker, Taming the System: The Control of Discretion in Criminal Justice 1950-1990, p. 51 (1993). [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:16 am by Marcia Shein
INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL DUTY TO INVESTIGATE MENTAL HEALTH
Shaw v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Wexler of Seyfarth Shaw on the firm’s Workplace Class Action Blog 8 Questions For Doing Business in China – Washington, DC attorney Meena Harris of Covington & Burling on the firm’s blog, InsidePrivacy Unpaid Internships Given New Life by the Second Circuit – Cleveland lawyer Todd Leibowitz of BakerHostetler on the firm’s Workplace Class Action Blog The Impact of King v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
92% Say No – Miami attorney Jim Walker of Walker & O’Neill on his blog, Cruise Law News For more of the best, check out LXBN, a complete review of the top insight and commentary across the LexBlog Network. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 7:15 am by Maureen Johnston
Shaw 13-897Issue: Whether, in a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a state appellate court’s holding that an omitted state law issue ultimately lacked merit precludes a federal habeas court from later finding either deficient performance or prejudice relating to that omission under the standards of Strickland v. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 4:46 am by Edith Roberts
Analysis of yesterday’s oral argument in the federal bank fraud case Shaw v. [read post]