Search for: "Shawe v. Elting" Results 1 - 20 of 30
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2022, 4:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Mazzocchi v Gilbert, 185 AD3d 438, 438 [1st Dept 2020], lv denied 37 NY3d 908 [2021]; Shawe v Elting, 161 AD3d 585, 588 [1st Dept 2018], lv denied 32 NY3d 907 [2018]). [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 5:46 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Mazzocchi v Gilbert, 185 AD3d 438, 438 [1st Dept 2020], lv denied 37 NY3d 908 [2021]; Shawe v Elting, 161 AD3d 585, 588 [1st Dept 2018], lv denied 32 NY3d 907 [2018]). [read post]
6 May 2022, 4:12 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Mazzocchi v Gilbert, 185 AD3d 438, 438 [1st Dept 2020], lv denied 37 NY3d 908 [2021]; Shawe v Elting, 161 AD3d 585, 588 [1st Dept 2018], lv denied 32 NY3d 907 [2018]). [read post]
12 Feb 2022, 3:36 pm by Kim Krawiec
The paper itself describes several business law cases from different jurisdictions, including Shawe v. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 4:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiffs’ claim under Judiciary Law § 487 was properly dismissed because the conduct alleged did not take place in a New York court (Shawe v Elting, 161 AD3d 585, 588 [1st Dept 2018]). [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 6:32 am by Jay R. McDaniel, Esq.
Buy-sell agreements, like a shotgun sale triggered by a deadlock, are the principal means by which the owners of closely held businesses protect against the worst consequences of deadlock. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 4:32 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Just two weeks ago, in Shawe v Elting, 2018 NY Slip Op 03644 [1st Dept May 22, 2018], the Appellate Division – First Department affirmed Justice Kornreich’s dismissal decision in all respects. [read post]
30 May 2018, 4:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “Moreover, our rulings in Elting v Shawe (129 AD3d 648 [1st Dept 2015]) and Elting v Shawe (136 AD3d 536 [1st Dept 2016]), in which we held that the payroll access and corporate ownership assertions, made in support of the TRO and preliminary injunction applications in the 2014 action, were not material, collaterally estop Shawe from relying on those misstatements. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 3:29 am by Peter Mahler
Finally, Professor Brian JM Quinn of the Boston College Law School filed an interesting amicus brief in Koshy in which he urged the court to take guidance from the Delaware Supreme Court’s recent decision in Shawe v Elting authorizing a sale of the highly profitable TransPerfect company based on the irreconcilable deadlock between its two owners. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 3:29 am by Peter Mahler
., impasse over distributions or the hiring or firing of key personnel, but I’ve seen no attempt to fashion an overall framework for evaluating claims of deadlock, that is, until last month’s opinion in Koshy v Sachdev (read here) in which the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, in its first-ever effort to construe that state’s deadlock-dissolution statute, devised a four-factor test to determine whether a “true deadlock” exists. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 5:46 am by Carl Neff
 The Delaware Supreme Court, in its recent decision of Shawe v. [read post]