Search for: "Sheeran v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 44
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
Music and Copyright IPKat provides a summary of the three cases brought in the United States claiming that the song Thinking Out Loud performed by Ed Sheeran, copied Let’s Get It On performed by Marvin Gaye. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 3:11 pm
IP rights define boundaries of exclusion, inclusion and belonging, tied to nation-state building. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm
Apparently it was also brought forward during the meeting of the EPO’s Administrative Council late June by various member states. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm
Apparently it was also brought forward during the meeting of the EPO’s Administrative Council late June by various member states. [read post]
1 May 2023, 5:58 pm
Sheeran had the easier job. [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:46 am
The plaintiffs allege that singer-songwriter Ed Sheeran copied the melodic and rhythmic elements of the song without permission in his 2014 hit “Thinking Out Loud. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 9:02 am
The case ultimately ruled in Google’s favor, stating that the project was transformative and constituted fair use. [read post]
26 Dec 2022, 1:43 pm
” Sheeran v. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 2:12 am
Donelan has ditched the previous Secretary of State’s inflated claims that the DPDI Bill saved over £1 billion. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 11:55 am
Show notes are located at www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/147 ED SHEERAN GETS AWARD OF COST “THE” OHIO STATE GETS TRADEMARK FOR “THE” FYRE TV PORN COMPANY CLAIMS REVERSE PASSING OFF, ETC., AGAINST AMAZONCOPYRIGHT ROYALTY BOARD CONFIRMS STREAMING ROYALTY RAISE FOR PUBLISHERS AND SONGWRITERSCOURT REJECTS ROY MOORE’S DEFAMATION SUIT AGAINST SACHA BARON COHENPRACTICE TIP: CANADA EXTENDS COPYRIGHT FOR MUSICAL WORKS BY 20 YEARSSupreme… [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 1:05 am
Sheeran & Ors v Chokri & Ors [2022] EWHC 827 (Ch): for church musicians (and others) who may be tempted to plagiarize the work of others, see especially [30] to [77] – a virtuoso piece of musical analysis by Zacaroli J. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 11:48 am
Pulte v. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 4:35 pm
Sheeran and other claimants are seeking negative declaratory relief that they had not infringed the defendants’ copyright. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 6:46 am
This will have a direct impact of the decision on Ed Sheeran "Let's Get it On" v "Thinking Out Loud" case [Katpost here], where Sheeran's lawyers argued that the Let's Get It On deposit defines the scope of protection, but Townsend's team argued that the composition is embodied on the Gaye recording. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 11:17 am
Ltd v Aiwa Corp. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 4:28 am
Readers may remember the case of Ed Sheeran and Sam Chokri, discussed by this Kat back in August 2018 here. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am
In Rimini Street, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:34 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 9:46 am
Katfriend Nicoletta Epaminonda takes a loot at the Cypriot transposition of the Trade Mark Directive 2015/2436 and reflects on what the future might hold for trade marks in this Member State. [read post]
9 Feb 2019, 2:13 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
