Search for: "Sheff v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 68
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2014, 12:51 pm
Not sure he has new things to say about that general topic.Cathay Smith: In the ideal situation, would Rogers v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:21 pm
Gov’t agencies and private parties may police these claims under federal and state laws.Artist compensation claims are fact-based, not opinion/puffery. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 10:36 am
But the same notion of consumer ability to self-protect/make meaning can also be used in product markets, as w/Sheff’s data and the many Tiffanys in the world. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 2:48 pm
Session 2: The Product Market DimensionRobert Burrell: why do we treat territorial and product markets so differently? [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 10:06 am
So we have exhaustion in theory but in practice a retailer can prevent it.Dorpan v. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 2:02 pm
, 40 Rutgers Law Journal 793 (2010); Against Certification, 78 George Washington Law Review 114 (2009); and Demosprudence, Interactive Federalism, and Twenty Years of Sheff v. [read post]
Bowman v Monsanto: the US Supreme Court rules on patent exhaustion and replication of patented seeds
14 May 2013, 2:09 pm
Yesterday, the Supreme Court of the United States delivered its long-awaited judgment in the case of Bowman v Monsanto Co. et Al., unanimously ruling that 'patent exhaustion does not permit a farmer to reproduce patented seeds through planting and harvesting without the patent holder's permission'. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 9:14 am
How much do we trust courts v. signals from the PTO? [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 9:13 am
Playing with reality v. paper rights to compromise reflecting different systems. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 1:00 pm
If our commercial speech doctrine doesn’t soon start recognizing this, the regulatory state will be in trouble. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 11:45 am
Example: LV v. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 2:43 pm
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court hears argument in Bowman v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 7:08 am
Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 5:36 am
Celebrities in ads: federal and state infringement, federal and state dilution, false endorsement, defamation, and right of publicity are all possibilities. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 2:50 pm
., Prestonettes v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 10:18 am
Americans v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 2:34 pm
Sheff: Century 21 v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 7:47 pm
Glynn Lunney: He heard an argument for reduced damages for unauthorized users who create value, but that doesn’t implicate blocking copyrights as in Gracen v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 9:23 am
Twenty years ago, the ACLU brought a landmark case, Sheff v. [read post]
