Search for: "Sheffield v. Sheffield" Results 141 - 160 of 244
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2018, 2:49 am by INFORRM
The fifth day of the trial of Sir Cliff Richard v BBC saw the conclusion of the claimant’s case and the first witness for the BBC. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 10:42 am by ERIC J DIRGA PA
Sheffield, 95 So. 2d 912, 916 (Fla. 1957). [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm by Adam Wagner
First, following Mr Justice Munby in Re E (an Alleged Patient); Sheffield City Council v E and S [2004] EWHC 2808 (Fam), he compared sexual consent to consenting to marriage. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 3:17 pm
The beard in question belongs to one V. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 3:24 pm by NL
It includes also those situations where, in general terms, a housing authority must act "fairly and reasonably" in administering its responsibilities: see, for example, Sheffield City Council v Smart (2002) HLR 34. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 3:24 pm by NL
It includes also those situations where, in general terms, a housing authority must act "fairly and reasonably" in administering its responsibilities: see, for example, Sheffield City Council v Smart (2002) HLR 34. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:29 am by Adam Wagner
On Tuesday 3 November 2009 at Sheffield Crown Court a jury was sworn in to hear the trial of Ryan Ward for murder. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 1:56 am by Liz Williams
This is a live blog of the second and final day of the hearing of the appeal brought by the Scotch Whisky Association and others, concerning the lawfulness of the Scottish Government’s plans to introduce minimum pricing for alcohol. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 1:16 am
It can be found, in the plural ("numpties") in Sheffield Wednesday Football Club Ltd and others v Hargreaves [2007] EWHC 2375 (QB), a Queen's Bench ruling of Richard Parkes QC, sitting as an additional High Court judge. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 4:50 am
The impermissible compromise principle is applied when juries have rendered inexplicably low verdict awards on damages as in Sheffield v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:29 am by Tim Sitzmann
In the Board’s 2012 decision of Research in Motion Ltd. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 11:55 am by Giles Peaker
See for example Ball v Plumber (1879) 23 SJ 656, CA (so, well established), or Sheffield City Council v Hazel St Clare Oliver LRX/146/2007 (our report). [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:51 am by Adam Wagner
BM v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 366 (05 April 2011) - Read judgment Another control order has been ruled unlawful and quashed by the court of appeal, on the basis that the evidence relied upon to impose it was “too vague and speculative”. [read post]
14 May 2023, 12:19 am by David Pocklington
Ecclesiastical lawyers will perhaps be more familiar with Martin v Mackonochie, Law Reports, Privy Council Appeal, Cases, 1867-9, pp. 386 to 392, and Mackonochie v Lord Penzance (1881) 6 App Cas 424. [read post]