Search for: "Shelby County Election Commission" Results 81 - 98 of 98
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2014, 11:39 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Thanks in part to the Parnell administration’s efforts, last year the Supreme Court struck down Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act in the Shelby County case. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins to Geoffrey Stone and David Strauss in connection with their new book, “Democracy and Equality: The Enduring Constitutional Vision of the Warren Court” (Oxford University Press, 2020). [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 9:39 am by Ronald Collins
Edgar Hoover during the Warren Commission’s investigation into the assassination of President Kennedy. [read post]
10 May 2017, 6:26 am by Kate Howard
North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP 16-833 Issues: (1) Whether a federal court has the authority to re-impose, under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, the same “anti-retrogression” preclearance standard invalidated as to Section 5 by Shelby County v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 8:45 am by Kate Howard
North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP 16-833 Issues: (1) Whether a federal court has the authority to reimpose, under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, the same “anti-retrogression” preclearance standard invalidated as to Section 5 by Shelby County v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 7:59 am by Kate Howard
North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP 16-833 Issues: (1) Whether a federal court has the authority to reimpose, under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, the same “anti-retrogression” preclearance standard invalidated as to Section 5 by Shelby County v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:19 am by John Elwood
The San Diego County Sheriff, however, defines “good cause” to require a showing of a particularized need for self-defense. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 7:01 pm by Eugene Volokh
Marion County Election Board), and legislative gerrymandering based on party affiliation (Rucho v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 8:29 am by Andrew Hamm
In Marbury, Marshall made several ingenious Machiavellian moves: (1) He did not recuse himself: Marshall, the Supreme Court jurist, judged a case involving his actions as President John Adams’ secretary of state when he commissioned William Marbury as a justice of the peace, a commission that Marshall’s brother James failed to deliver on time. (2) He stacked the deck by prioritizing the issues in the case: Marshall left the procedural issue of subject-matter… [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 8:59 am by John Elwood
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, 16-111 Issue: Whether applying Colorado’s public accommodations law to compel the petitioner to create expression that violates his sincerely held religious beliefs about marriage violates the free speech or free exercise clause of the First Amendment. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  But the goal of the Republican politicians who brought the case was flat-out erasure of a despised Democratic president’s signature legislative accomplishment in an election year. [read post]