Search for: "Shell Oil Co. v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 154
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2010, 8:12 am by WSLL
Whether the district court properly determined that State Lease 79-0645 was a “replacement lease” under the Unit NPI Contract. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 7:52 pm by John Bellinger
  They argue that international law does not permit U.S. courts to exercise jurisdiction over the acts of foreign corporations (such as Shell) in third countries where there is no nexus to the United States. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 7:05 am by Steven Boutwell
Shell Oil Co., 2007 WL 2220986 (S.D.Tex. 2007), the court granted a request for summary judgment since the spar, the URSA was not vessel. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 8:39 am
That makes the United States the largest purchaser of oil produced in the Niger Delta. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 3:09 am by Dennis Crouch
Shell Oil Company, et al., No. 16-713 BPCIA – Notice of Commercial Marketing: Apotex Inc., et al. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:43 pm by Tom Goldstein
Shell Oil Products Company; Shell Oil Products Company v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 4:30 am
Shell Oil Co., 602 F.3d 1087, 1091–92 (9th Cir.2010), also recognized this reasoning, stating that it is likely that “Congress intended that the usual and long-standing principles apply ... post-filing developments do not defeat jurisdiction if jurisdiction was properly invoked as of the time of filing. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:46 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Recent English case against Shell’s Board of Directors In March 2022, ClientEarth, an environmental law charity which holds shares in the publicly-listed oil and gas company, Shell plc, announced that it had engaged in pre-action legal correspondence with Shell’s board of directors. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 12:24 pm by Hunton & Williams LLP
Shell Oil, 466 U.S. 54 (1984), but observed that Shell’s progeny cases all “involved articulable circumstances that suggested the existence of violations beyond those specified in the charges,” factors not present in Nestle. [read post]