Search for: "Shell Oil Co. v. United States" Results 141 - 154 of 154
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2008, 2:40 pm
(IP Dragon) Bad faith trade mark registrations: Sony Ericsson v Mr Lui (IPKat) In letter to Chinese government, Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPOA) weakens opposition to 'international exhaustion' (Hal Wegner) IP laws evolving in China (Law360)   Colombia Colombia changes trade name deposit requirements (IP tango) FINESSE, MEN'S FITNESS confusingly similar, rules Colombia Council (IP tango)   Denmark Court denies injunction request in… [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm by admin
The two companies will also pay a combined $3.3 million civil penalty to the United States as well as to Alabama and Louisiana, and $200,000 to Louisiana organ [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 1:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at [feeds.feedburner.com]Highlights this week included:Chinese company Zhongyi Electronic sues Microsoft for alleged patent infringement relating to technology that converts Roman characters to Chinese characters: (Jurist), (China Hearsay), (IP Dragon),US Patent reform and surrounding controversy: general commentary and opinions: (Patent Baristas), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (Patent … [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 1:05 am
 The transition from shell to metal: beads fashioned from copper (dark) and from Spondylus (spiny oyster) shells (light). [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 12:47 pm by admin
Tatel, United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit; and Steven R. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
: (Patent Baristas), US: How to avoid a permanent injunction: the lessons of Amgen v Hoffman-LaRoche: (Patent Docs), US: Jarvik Heart’s PTE request based on PMA shell/module submission dates flatlines; ruling on initiation of PTE ‘review period’ mirrors FDA policy for ‘fast track’ products: (FDA Law Blog) Pharma & Biotech - Products Kytril (Granisetron) – Exclusivity ‘parking’… [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm by admin
The United States Court of Appeals explained its understanding of complexity that should remove a case from the province of the seventh amendment: “A suit is too complex for a jury when circumstances render the jury unable to decide in a proper manner. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 10:08 am by Richard Marsolais
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and argued before the Supreme Court of the United States where he won the seminal case, J.E.M. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 5:42 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
Most other States have experienced unacceptably long processing and adjudication delays. [read post]