Search for: "Shepherd v. Shepherd" Results 61 - 80 of 703
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2020, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
Henry Waxman (D-CA) shepherded a grand legislative compromise through Congress that balanced the rights and solved inefficient regulatory consequences for both branded and generic drug makers. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 11:10 am
Kevin Shepherd won at an IAC remand hearing in State v. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 3:59 pm
Meanwhile, James Stark of Garden Court North has put up a briefing note on the rejection of Payne v Cooper in Porter v Shepherds Bush (he is not happy). [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 3:29 am by tracey
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Harrison & Ors v Shepherd Homes Ltd & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 904 (05 July 2012) Graham v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Jobcentre Plus) (Rev 1) [2012] EWCA Civ 903 (05 July 2012) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Aldridge v R. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 8:45 am by Samantha Knights, Matrix.
  Both he and Lady Hale (at §70) cited D v Home Office [2006] 1 WLR 1003 apparently with approval which required a causation test as regards breaches of the 2001 Rules. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 8:00 pm by Jennifer Shepherd
by Jennifer Shepherd Can a Canadian employer justify an employee’s dismissal for acts committed after he or she has been fired? [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 4:48 am
While the parish has not formally dissociated itself from the Episcopal Church, the complaint (full text) in Protestant Episcopal Church of the Diocese of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:08 pm
Knowsley HT v White, Honeyghan-Green v LB Islington & Porter v Shepherds Bush Housing Association [2008] UKHL 70 -   for anyone who hasn’t read it yet. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 8:54 pm by Howard Bashman
Laurie McGinley and Katie Shepherd of The Washington Post report that “FDA eliminates key restriction on abortion pill as Supreme Court weighs case that challenges Roe v. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 2:42 pm by Giles Peaker
Goode v Paradigm Housing , October 2015 The Appellant had been an assured tenant since 25th March 2013. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 8:52 am
(One reason for granting review was that the Court of Appeal had left it up to the lower courts whether to apply neutral principles or not, and remain with the old "deference" standard of Watson v. [read post]