Search for: "Shepherd v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 455
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2017, 5:59 pm by Amy Howe
Four judges – Chief Judge Lavenski Smith and Judges Steven Colloton, Raymond Gruender and Bobby Shepherd – indicated that they would have granted the state’s motion. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 9:31 am by Maseeh Moradi
Green Bay Co., 80 U.S. 166 (1872). [4] United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 12:56 pm by Randy Barnett
These originalists maintain that the Privileges or Immunities Clause was a free standing provision, the substance of which included both the “Corfield v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 1:03 pm by Alex Potcovaru, Quinta Jurecic
Andrew Kent examined the Supreme Court’s decision in Hernandez v. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 3:00 am by SOG Staff
  The United States Supreme Court granted cert this week in Carpenter v. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 3:04 pm by Jamie Markham
Judge Spainhour also shepherded the Commission into the Justice Reinvestment era. [read post]
31 May 2017, 5:06 pm by Lorene Park
It could also find that Kohl’s statements were made with a “reckless or wanton disregard for the truth” (Shepherd v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 1:06 am
"Joint tortfeasanceThe Supreme Court's decision in Sea Shepherd UK v Fish & Fish was once again wheeled out to consider the question of joint tortfeasance. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Legal Beagle
”Latest Court of Session opinion on Heather Capital, published 28 February 2017: EXTRA DIVISION, INNER HOUSE, COURT OF SESSION[2017] CSIH 19 CA207/14 and CA208/14 Lady Paton Lady Clark of Calton Lord Glennie OPINION OF LADY PATON in the cause HEATHER CAPITAL LIMITED (in liquidation) and PAUL DUFFY (as liquidator) Pursuer and Reclaimer against LEVY & McRAE and others Defenders and Respondents and HEATHER CAPITAL LIMITED (in liquidation) and PAUL DUFFY (as liquidator) Pursuer… [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 6:54 am
 Master Clark considered the authorities including HHJ Hacon's interpretation of the Supreme Court in Sea Shepherd UK v Fish & Fish Ltd [2015] UKSC 10: "I interpret this to mean that in order to fix an alleged joint tortfeasor with liability, it must be shown both that he actively co-operated to bring about the act of the primary tortfeasor and also that he intended that his co-operation would help to bring about that act (the act found to be tortious). [read post]
17 Dec 2016, 9:11 am by Eric Goldman
Desert View * Teacher’s Semi-Racy Facebook Photo Doesn’t Justify Firing – In re Laraine Cook * Social Worker’s Facebook Rant Justified Termination — Shepherd v. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 12:15 am
The law has been recently considered by the Supreme Court in Sea Shepherd UK v Fish & Fish Limited [2015] UKSC 10; [2015] AC 1229, which I sought to summarise in Vertical Leisure Limited v Poleplus Limited [2015] EWHC 841 (IPEC). [read post]