Search for: "Sherlock v. Alling"
Results 121 - 139
of 139
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2015, 10:47 am
Thus, the Conan Doyle Estate cannot use its expired copyrights to prevent sequels to the Sherlock Holmes stories, as long as derivative works still subject to copyright are not used. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 7:21 am
Good news all round then! [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:14 pm
P'ship v. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
Supreme Court decided a case, BMW of North America v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
It's no secret that this writer believes the decision to be fundamentally wrong: whilst the recordings share a very similar 'vibe' - the songs are quite different - and this case was all about the alleged copying of a song. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 4:30 am
See Maestas v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 6:36 pm
, Best v. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 2:41 pm
See Eckardt v. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 2:53 pm
Jackson and Dixon v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 5:35 am
v=yI3i8aov7g8. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 8:36 am
All these are enduring achievements. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 2:55 pm
Solis v. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 1:31 pm
The case is New Line Cinema v. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 4:48 pm
Military men (bluff and genial, old and doddery, young and resentful); military wives, ranging from Mrs Leslie in Berlin , “the model of an army wife (“one knew instinctively that she referred to her husband’s regiment as “My regiment”, to the regimental wives as “my wives”, did her duty as to Welfare, and all that concerned the good of the battalion, played an excellent game of bridge, and adequate game of tennis and gold, read all the… [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:47 am
Pam Samuelson: legislative changes/courts v. legislators? [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 4:30 pm
” You may recognize the dialogue between me and my platoon sergeant as a parable sometimes told of detective Sherlock Holmes and his assistant Dr. [read post]
24 May 2017, 2:50 am
On the other hand, the opposition division also held that O1's opposition was inadmissible and took a separate "additional decision" to this effect (see above point V). [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 11:18 am
That sounds almost exactly like the claim made against the defendants in the Bone Screw litigation – and which, when presented as a state-law claim, was unanimously held preempted in Buckman Co. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 12:34 pm
Do you remember the famous Sherlock Holmes mystery in which the most significant fact, in Holmes's view after explaining how he solved the case, was the dog that did not bark? [read post]
