Search for: "Sherlock v. Sherlock"
Results 1 - 20
of 208
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2013, 1:00 am
The District Court quickly dispatched with this question by holding that the Supreme Court's ruling in Silverman v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 8:02 pm
Chief Judge Ruben Castillo of the Northern District of Illinois relied on a similar case, Silverman v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 5:58 am
, v USA Cable, 2004 U.S. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 12:57 am
Although the courts have acknowledged in Klinger v Conan Doyle Estate that Sherlock Holmes as a character is protectable (within the relevant term), the extent of "roundedness" that could extend outside of the term is very debatable. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 12:57 am
Although the courts have acknowledged in Klinger v Conan Doyle Estate that Sherlock Holmes as a character is protectable (within the relevant term), the extent of "roundedness" that could extend outside of the term is very debatable. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 2:20 pm
The Conan Doyle Estate also dispatches with what would seem to be contradictory case law, Silverman v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 12:57 am
Although the courts have acknowledged in Klinger v Conan Doyle Estate that Sherlock Holmes as a character is protectable (within the relevant term), the extent of "roundedness" that could extend outside of the term is very debatable. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 12:57 am
Although the courts have acknowledged in Klinger v Conan Doyle Estate that Sherlock Holmes as a character is protectable (within the relevant term), the extent of "roundedness" that could extend outside of the term is very debatable. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 6:00 am
Citing Scott v. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 12:21 pm
Quoting Silverman v CBS, Justice Posner stated that "[t]he copyrights on the derivative works, corresponding to the copyrights on the ten last Sherlock Holmes stories, were not extended by virtue of the incremental additions of originality in the derivative works". [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 10:59 am
Pictures, Inc. v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 9:22 am
In June 2014 the US Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit issued its decision in Leslie Klinger v Conan Doyle Estate, in which upheld the decision of the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois - Eastern Division that author Leslie Klinger was free to use material in the 50 Sherlock Holmes stories and novels that were no longer protected by copyright. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 5:07 am
The action was filed with the United States District Court of New Mexico.In June 2014 the US Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit issued its decision in Leslie Klinger v Conan Doyle Estate, in which upheld the decision of the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois - Eastern Division that author Leslie Klinger was free to use material in the 50 Sherlock Holmes stories and novels that were no longer protected by copyright. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 3:55 pm
Klinger v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 1:51 am
Considering that Sherlock (Holmes) and (Dr.) [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 2:12 pm
Today the US Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit issued its decision in Leslie Klinger v Conan Doyle Estate, in which upheld the decision of the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois - Eastern Division that Mr Klinger was free to use material in the 50 Sherlock Holmes stories and novels that are no longer protected by copyright. [read post]
30 Dec 2023, 4:05 pm
An interesting false light lawsuit filed today, Walter v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:58 am
Poppy's fashionable twist to the traditional Sherlock Holmes ensemble:but will it be sufficiently original? [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 1:04 am
Supreme Court to protect the copyright surrounding the author’s most famous character - Sherlock Holmes. [read post]
