Search for: "Sherman v. United States" Results 341 - 360 of 1,040
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2017, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
The first is Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 10:29 am by Scott R. Anderson
The most notable example of this practice is the Supreme Court’s own 1942 decision in United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which legendary boxer Muhammad Ali appealed the rejection of his application for conscientious objector status at the height of the Vietnam War”; Justice Sonia Sotomayor presided, and “Justice Clarence Thomas, who sometimes seems bored on the bench, watched raptly from a spectator’s seat. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 6:34 am by Joy Waltemath
Court of Appeals in San Francisco to reverse a decision by a federal district court in Seattle that granted a motion to dismiss finding that the State of Washington clearly and affirmatively expressed a legislative decision to allow Seattle to displace competition in the for-hire driver service market (Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 2:51 am by Scott Bomboy
On November 9, 1953, the United States Supreme Court upheld a prior, controversial decision that allowed major league baseball to operate outside of the Sherman Antitrust Act. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 3:00 am by Garrett Hinck
Deputy Assistant Secretaries of State Patrick Murphy and Marc Storella will testify alongside V. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 4:21 am by Edith Roberts
The most high-profile grant was in United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 8:55 am by Amy Howe
The highest-profile grant of the day came in United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:05 am by John Elwood
That fee is set by a schedule based on the floor area of the units built. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether a guilty plea waives a challenge to the constitutionality of an offense. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether a guilty plea waives a defendant’s right to appeal the constitutionality of the law At Take Care, Samuel Bagenstos argues that in Husted v. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 12:29 pm by Diane Ring
On Tuesday, July 31, 207, in Chamber of Commerce of the United States, et al.,  v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 6:27 am by Joy Waltemath
However, a preliminary injunction prohibiting enforcement of the ordinance will remain in effect until the court resolves a motion to dismiss pending in a companion case (Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 9:27 am by Kevin Goldberg and Karyn K. Ablin
SESAC fight as well, but for those who want to be spoon-fed, here’s a brief recap of what has happened over the last few years: In October 2012, the RMLC sued SESAC in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, alleging that SESAC was engaged in anticompetitive behavior in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the court upheld the convictions of the defendants in a notorious murder trial over a claim that evidence had been suppressed in violation of Brady v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 11:17 am
Sometimes you file appeals (or even entire lawsuits) knowing full well that they're going to lose, but hoping -- sometimes without hope -- that the United States Supreme Court will eventually step in.Almost always, you're totally right that you're going to lose, and your hopes for Supreme Court review are -- almost always -- similarly dashed.All of these are thoughts that I had when I read this morning's Ninth Circuit opinion.Of course the plaintiffs were… [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the court held that a defendant had been prejudiced by his attorney’s erroneous advice that a guilty plea would not result in mandatory deportation. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 11:14 am by Howard M. Wasserman
In 2012, Sherman sued the town of Chester in state court on a host of federal and state claims, including for a regulatory taking; the town removed the case to federal district court and the case took one trip to the U.S. [read post]