Search for: "Sherman v. United States"
Results 701 - 720
of 1,003
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2011, 6:42 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has affirmed the dismissal of a purported class action against television programmers and distributors alleging that the programmers’ practice of selling multi-channel cable packages violates Section 1 of the Sherman Act. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 3:20 pm
United States, 370 U.S. 294, 325 (1962)). [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 10:29 pm
The Supreme Court has called them "the Magna Carta of free enterprise", United States v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 1:26 pm
Cobb, H&R Block’s president and CEO.Further information regarding United States v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 8:54 pm
Earlier, we asked whether fixing costs in a European sport that is broadcast in the United States might run afoul of American antitrust law. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:01 am
United States. [read post]
23 May 2011, 6:12 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the ruling in 2010. [read post]
18 May 2011, 12:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 4:43 pm
King, where the United States Supreme Court issued a ruling that will have major implications on searches and seizures. [read post]
15 May 2011, 12:04 am
United States, in which it held that the oil conglomerate, founded by magnate John D. [read post]
13 May 2011, 12:30 pm
On Wednesday, April 27, 2011, the United States Supreme Court decided AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 12:25 pm
(import "generally denotes a product (or perhaps a service) [that] has been brought into the United States from abroad") (quoting Turicentro S.A. v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 6:07 am
In response, Rock River sued Universal alleging that it violated Sections 2 and 7 of the Sherman Act by (1) attempting to monopolize the reggae genre of sound records in the United States; and (2) restraining trade and threatening to create a monopoly. [read post]
12 May 2011, 9:51 am
United States District Judge Lucy H. [read post]
11 May 2011, 5:28 pm
Ritz Camera & Image v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 9:46 am
” “According to the department, without the judicially monitored restrictions, Google’s control over this key asset “would have substantially lessened competition among providers of comparative flight search websites in the United States, resulting in reduced choice and less innovation for consumers. [read post]
8 May 2011, 8:13 am
., et al. v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 3:46 pm
” Although the Sherman Anti-trust Act had been passed in 1890, the United States Supreme Court decision of U.S. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 12:53 pm
On April 27, 2011, the United States Supreme Court released its opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 1:58 pm
As elaborated by the Third Circuit in United States v. [read post]
