Search for: "Shield Defense Systems, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 267
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2024, 9:20 am by Eugene Volokh
Having one party incognito but not the other can tilt the scales of justice in the direction of guilt by anonymous accusation, a prospect which would be just as abhorrent to civil litigation as it is to our criminal justice system. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:11 am by Eugene Volokh
For one, there is a concern that anonymity may serve as a "shield behind which" false or "defamatory charges may be launched without shame or liability," thus creating the risk a blameless defendant will suffer embarrassment and reputational damage merely by being sued. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Having one party incognito but not the other can tilt the scales of justice in the direction of guilt by anonymous accusation, a prospect which would be just as abhorrent to civil litigation as it is to our criminal justice system. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:46 am by Eugene Volokh
Having one party incognito but not the other can tilt the scales of justice in the direction of guilt by anonymous accusation, a prospect which would be just as abhorrent to civil litigation as it is to our criminal justice system. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:57 am by Karen Gullo
It empowers authorities to compel “any individual” with knowledge of computer systems to provide any “necessary information” for conducting searches and seizures of computer systems. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:11 pm by Josh Blackman
Griffin's Case is consistent with the deeply rooted sword-shield dichotomy in federal courts' jurisprudence II. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 8:41 am by Dennis Crouch
The Federal Circuit rejected this argument based on dicta in Thryv, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 7:39 am by Eugene Volokh
"[A]nonymity provides a shield behind which defamatory charges may be launched without shame or liability. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 4:33 pm by Barry Barnett
 The year of Paradox’s debut, 1978, arrived “during a peak era of antitrust enforcement”.[6] But by 2004, Professor Bork’s panegyric to maximizing “consumer welfare” had led the United States Supreme Court to pronounce “charging monopoly prices” not only not a crime but an “important element of the free-market system”.[7]Indeed, Bork’s valorization of a narrowly economic measure of consumer… [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm by Ryan Goodman
Justin Hendrix, Justin Cole, Margaret Shields and Nicholas Tonckens, Timeline: Rep. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 9:04 pm by Scott McKeown
The federal courts don’t limit an invalidity defense to just the first lawsuit. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 9:04 pm by Scott McKeown
The federal courts don’t limit an invalidity defense to just the first lawsuit. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
There is reason to believe the SEC’s new universal proxy Rule 14a-19 will result in more stockholder nominees being elected to the boards of public companies. [read post]