Search for: "Shields v. Director"
Results 61 - 80
of 620
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2018, 7:26 am
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in EEOC v. [read post]
23 May 2021, 6:00 pm
Kahn v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 4:37 am
The majority held that plaintiff’s allegations that the directors permitted his brother and mother to “loot” the company by taking corporate funds for personal use and taking profits through excessive compensation overcame the business judgment rule’s presumptive shield at the pleading stage. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 6:45 am
He was previously Deputy Director of the Donald W. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 7:28 am
District Court for the Southern District of New York held Jan. 13 (Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 3:48 pm
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (Medicare Like Rates)United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 9:31 am
In Coster v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 9:30 pm
The Federal Judicial Center is seeking applications for Assistant Division Director for Judicial and Legal Education. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 7:00 am
App. 4th 1160 (shielding the summaries of personnel records of priests accused of 500 cases of child molestation which were prepared for mediation); Eisendrath v Superior Court (2003) 109 Cal. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 5:00 pm
In Gammel v. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 4:30 am
The complaint also called into question the fairness of the sale process, particularly undisclosed conflicts and inadequate disclosures in the proxy statement.Furthermore, although four directors were effectively shielded by an exculpatory clause, the court declined to dismiss the breach-of-duty claims against several other directors with ties to CD&R. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 12:00 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals held that “shielding the Director of the CFPB from removal without cause is consistent with Article II. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 10:08 am
Carlone v. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 10:03 am
Carlone v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:36 pm
” As I explained in an earlier post, Congress intended RFRA to incorporate by reference the Supreme Court’s Free Exercise Clause jurisprudence from the era preceding Employment Division v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 4:51 pm
The comparative negligence of banking regulators in failing to identify poor policies or loans during examinations has also been generally unavailing, as many federal courts have found that the FDIC as regulator owes no legal duty to the directors and officers to conduct bank regulatory examinations in any particular manner.[16] LESSON #6 – D&O INSURANCE IS A LAST LINE OF DEFENSE, NOT A COMPREHENSIVE SHIELD AGAINST LIABILITY D&O insurance is an… [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 12:14 pm
In Brandenburg v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 11:01 am
Circuit held in PHH Corp. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 10:32 am
“ICE will not allow war criminals and human rights abusers to use the U.S. as a safe haven,” said Acting Director Matthew Albence. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 3:30 am
Because a majority of the directors was self-interested in the board’s post-2014 compensation decisions, the court held that BCL § 505 (h) did not shield the board from liability for issuing itself stock options in Regeneron. [read post]
