Search for: "Shields v. Mapp" Results 1 - 7 of 7
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  I will keep on keeping on.The Fourth AmendmentAll four search-and-seizure cases involve questions of the substantive reach of the Fourth Amendment, not the remedy of exclusion of evidence under Mapp v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 9:46 am by Rachel Brown, Coleman Saunders
” The Fourth Amendment precludes the government from conducting unreasonable searches and seizures, but, as the Supreme Court noted in Mapp v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 10:46 am by Rick
— Tucker says: I told him about Mapp vs. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
United States), for federal agents, and to 1961 (Mapp v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 2:20 am by Kurt R. Karst
The new certification criterion is further laid out and explained in a special approval status rule for certain subsequent applicants at proposed FDC Act § 505(j)(5)(D)(v): (v) SPECIAL APPROVAL STATUS RULE FOR CERTAIN SUBSEQUENT APPLICANTS. [read post]