Search for: "Shields v. Murray" Results 1 - 20 of 48
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The US Supreme Court heard oral arguments on Tuesday in a landmark whistleblower case Murray v. [read post]
LLC),[5] and the other in the District of Columbia Circuit (see Judge Rogers in Doe v Exxon).[6] Both of these opinions support corporate liability under the ATS and likewise reflect the reasoning of Murray, Kinley and Pitts that the rumours of the death of corporate liability under the ATS are greatly exaggerated. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 9:36 am by Kay Marbiah
The Judgement Issue (i) The UKSC held that whether there is a reasonable expectation of privacy in the relevant information is a fact-specific enquiry.[5] In assessing whether Stage 1 was met, the UKSC referred to the “Murray factors”, identified in the CoA’s Murray v Express Newspapers plc decision.[6] These include: the attributes of the claimant, the nature of the activity in which the claimant was engaged, the place of the activity, the nature and… [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 9:19 pm
The doctrine is based on the inherent power of courts to enforce their judgments (see Degen v United States, supra at 823), and it has long been recognized and applied to those who evade the law while simultaneously seeking its protection (see Bonahan v Nebraska, 125 US 692 [1887]; Smith v United States, 94 US 97 [1876])" (Matter of Skiff-Murray v Murray, 305 AD2d 751, 752 [2003]). [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am by INFORRM
On Monday 11 October 2021, the Labour Party named Seumas Milne, Karie Murphy, Georgie Robertson, Laura Murray and Harry Hayball as the individuals responsible for leaking the report entitled “The work of the Labour Party’s Governance and Legal Unit in relation to antisemitism, 2014-2019. [read post]
7 May 2020, 1:00 am by CAFE
REFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS Vote for Stay Tuned with Preet to win a Webby for the best News & Politics podcast series THE Q&A: “Rules of Procedure United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary,” Senate Judiciary Committee Oral Arguments in Judiciary Committee v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 12:15 am
, (International Society of Family Law: Regional Conference in Israel, June 7-9, 2009).Ann Laquer Estin, Unofficial Family Law, (February 1, 2009).From Bepress:Abeer Ghazi Jarrar, Combating a Religious Radical Ideology v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
The first case on the agenda is Kelly v. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
” In the latest episode of Strict Scrutiny (podcast), Kate Shaw, Melissa Murray and Leah Litman “recap the argument in June Medical Services v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Privacy Shield Director Alex Greenstein, are on the “home stretch. [read post]