Search for: "Shields v. Thomas"
Results 41 - 60
of 553
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Civic Education, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
But as Justice Thomas has explained, qualified immunity should not shield public officials from liability for considered policy decisions and regulatory actions. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 2:47 pm
Purcell v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 1:58 pm
By Jennifer Bard Recent events, including the discovery that Justice Thomas has been accepting luxury vacations from and selling real estate to a billionaire, and the Fifth Circuit’s finding in Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine v. [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
Google and Twitter v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
Google and Twitter v. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 11:59 am
From today's North Dakota Supreme Court decision in Wrigley v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 11:30 am
Supreme Court this week heard arguments in Gonzalez v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 8:02 am
Partway through oral argument before the Supreme Court in Gonzalez v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 12:11 am
The US Supreme Court Tuesday heard oral arguments in Gonzales v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 1:31 pm
At issue in Gonzalez v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 6:11 am
The brief also cites Justice Clarence Thomas in Malwarebytes, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 4:16 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 9:49 am
In Maximillian Schrems v. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 10:52 am
In Coy v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 9:35 am
Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Gonzalez v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 5:01 am
From Mumma v. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 4:29 am
Kesper v. [read post]
19 Nov 2022, 12:40 pm
In re Thomas, 2022 VT 59. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 5:46 am
” Even domestic abusers get a pass under Bruen, as Texas District Court Judge David Counts ruled in U.S. v. [read post]