Search for: "Shipley v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 80
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2013, 3:00 am by David Oscar Markus
  Here's SCOTUSblog's coverage of the issue:The Justices agreed to hear an appeal by the federal government in United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 2:02 pm by Jeffrey Kahn
Yesterday the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit released its opinion in Latif v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 6:57 am by John Day
The court’s reasoning was guided by the recent Tennessee Supreme Court case of Shipley v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 11:05 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
But the court reversed itself after a motion for reconsideration in light of the Tennessee Supreme Court's decision in Shipley v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 4:30 am by Janet Lindenmuth
The case was eventually appealed to the United States Supreme Court which found in Burton v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
Shipley, Conflicts Between Copyright and the First Amendment After Harper & Row, Publishers v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 10:17 am by Jeffrey Kahn
Shipley ran the State Department’s Passport Office from 1928 to 1955. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 6:05 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Shipley Humble Oil Company, 370 A.2d 438, 440 (Pa.Cmwlth. 1977) to overrule the preliminary objections in this regard. [read post]
20 May 2011, 4:59 am by Marie Louise
Shipley (Gray on Claims) The Rambus Opinions: CAFC rules on the ‘reasonable forseeability’ of litigation: Micron Technology, Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 11:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Attorneys John Shipley and Sivashree Sundaram, from the U.S. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 5:57 am by Colin Murray
Strasbourg does not strike down UK legislation, it simply monitors whether, in cases brought before it, the laws of any one of the 47 states signed up to the ECHR have infringed particular rights that all of those states have agreed to accept. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 5:06 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Daniel Schwartz chimes in on yesterday's hot topic, Thompson v. [read post]