Search for: "Shirk v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 106
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2017, 11:07 am by Jordan Brunner
Navy SEAL, has withdrawn its permission for the United States to run Special Operations ground operations to target terrorists in the country. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm by Lorenzo d’Aubert, Eric Halliday
§ 1182(a)(6)(E), which provides that “[a]ny alien who at any time knowingly has encouraged, induced, assisted, abetted, or aided any other alien to enter or to try to enter the United States in violation of law is inadmissible. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
United States, the court held 8-1 that Congress is required to reimburse health insurance companies for losses created by the Affordable Care Act. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
United States, the federal bank fraud case that was also argued last week. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 11:18 am by Mary McCord
Our democratic institutions depend on an actual enumeration of the whole population of the United States as required by the Constitution. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 9:30 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
Customs and Border Protection] need not demonstrate that the [Chinese and Cypriot] articles are restricted; rather, the [CPIA] statute 'expressly places the burden on importers to prove that they are importable.'"The case of United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 9:55 am by Unknown
The opinion states that, even if the builder had not been a party to the purchase agreements, it constructed the townhomes and knew they would be sold to individual owners and should not be permitted to “shirk its responsibilities under implied warranties” to the homeowners. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 9:52 am by Yolanda J. Bromfield
In yet another cautionary tale displaying how seriously attorneys and clients must take discovery obligations, United States District Court Judge Beryl A. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 9:52 am by Yolanda J. Bromfield
In yet another cautionary tale displaying how seriously attorneys and clients must take discovery obligations, United States District Court Judge Beryl A. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 9:52 am by Yolanda J. Bromfield
In yet another cautionary tale displaying how seriously attorneys and clients must take discovery obligations, United States District Court Judge Beryl A. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 4:02 pm
The New York Court of Appeals, New York State’s highest court, recently issued an opinion in the case captioned, People v. [read post]
5 Aug 2023, 3:42 pm by Ilya Somin
It is long established and ordinarily uncontroversial that speech can lose the protection of the First Amendment if, for example, it seeks to intimidate a public official into shirking a legal duty, or if it consists of the submission of forged documents to a government agency, or if it solicits or facilitates crime generally (this past term's Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]