Search for: "Shoe v. Administrator, Va*"
Results 181 - 200
of 285
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2024, 11:54 am
Supreme Court’s holding in Obergefell v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 5:39 am
He told her to wear a surgical shoe, and prescribed pain killers and antibiotics. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
In the case of Doherty v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 2:40 pm
: A Bush administration post-mortem (Hal Wegner) US Patents America's innovation lead looks safe, but things could change (IAM) Bessen and Meurer comparing the mortgage bubble to the patent bubble (Techdirt) Call for comments on Ex Parte Appeal Rule (Patent Docs) Fulbright & Jaworski '2008 Litigation Trends Survey' (Law360) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) (IAM) Guidance on patentee's provisional rights (Law360) Online priority document exchange… [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
In the case of Doherty v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:19 am
(IP Dragon) DuPont learns that global IP theft doesn’t stop at the border (China Hearsay) Europe The chocolate menagerie: General Court decides on bunny, reindeer and mouse shapes: Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG v OHIM (jiplp) ECJ rules on legislative limitations on copyright protection for designs in Europe: Flos SpA v Semeraro Casa e Famiglia SpA (jiplp) AG delivers opinion in Viking Gas A/S v BP Gas A/S concerning trade mark law and refilling of… [read post]
16 Aug 2014, 12:15 pm
Sebelius and King v. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 9:47 am
In Pearson v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 4:57 pm
(And will you stand in my shoes if I agree to stand in yours?) [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 4:33 pm
From Judge Mark Hornak's decision two weeks ago in Newman v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 4:16 am
I havent been in your shoes for a long time but I can tell ya that God has a plan for you and your life. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
” Last week, the Justices of the United States Supreme Court debated just that scenario, in Redding v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
There has not been a successful s. 15 claim before the Supreme Court of Canada since the 2007 decision in Canada (Attorney General) v Hislop, 2007 SCC 10, [2007] 1 SCR 429. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 7:55 am
Private law is attractive: property, contract, and tort—accepted and stable; low administrative costs; cheap to operate—something that patent is not (accepted and stable). [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm
While courts generally recognize and enforce contractual agreements by a party to consent to jurisdiction, mere registration of an out-of-state business to do business in a state historically has not been recognized as creating the necessary “substantial minimum contacts” that the Due Process clause of the United States Constitution generally requires exist to provide the general personal jurisdiction that must exist for a state court to possess jurisdiction to decide a lawsuit over the… [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
See State v. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 12:36 pm
" Failure to comply with the order may result in administrative or criminal penalties …. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 1:47 am
" FDIC v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC sets strict standards to establish inequitable conduct: Star Scientific v R J Reynolds Tobacco: (Hal Wegner), (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (more from Patently-O), (Philip Brooks), (Law360), (I/P Updates), Safe harbour ruling in Io v Veoh could help YouTube in Viacom… [read post]
