Search for: "Shoe v. Administrator, Va*"
Results 21 - 40
of 282
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2023, 4:40 am
Even so, the admittedly fuzzy distinction between direct and indirect injuries gets at the limitation I'm describing, which might also be analogized to proximate cause.Some version of that idea--either the direct/indirect distinction or the notion of proximate cause--helps explain why rejecting standing for Missouri even if it stands in the shoes of MOHELA is consistent with the standing analysis in Dep't of Commerce v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 7:07 am
Nestle v Cadbury [2022] EWHC 1671 (Ch) (July 2022)You can’t trade mark a colour. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm
v. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 11:41 am
Now, that leisurely divergence is likely to get upended because during the, blink and you missed it, Liz Truss Administration, the government published draft legislation to revoke at the end of 2023 all Retained EU Laws except any which might be chosen to be explicitly preserved. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 9:42 pm
Ct. at 1012, "especially weighing the factor[] of time elapsed since the inception of the suit," Smoke v. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 3:38 am
A draft decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
26 Nov 2022, 6:52 am
” Light v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 12:09 pm
The court’s 1945 decision in International Shoe Co. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 7:18 am
This conclusion is buttressed by the tenor of the Supreme Court’s unanimous 2021 opinion in AMG Capital v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 7:59 am
” New York v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 12:28 am
Guthrie and Cravath The era of the white-shoe lawyer arguably began on May 1, 1899, when Paul Cravath, then a 37-year-old corporate lawyer lateraled into the Seward law firm, thus becoming the law partner of 40-year-old William Guthrie in the firm that would eventually evolve into Cravath Swaine & Moore. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:36 am
Similar result for chevrons on shoes, where the registrant’s only problem was that the depiction of the mark showed it stitched onto the shoe. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 2:04 pm
Under Employment Division v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 8:45 am
[The Biden Administration is apparently considering a range of responses should te Supreme Court overturn Roe v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 8:55 am
One obvious example is that Mathews v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am
But if the Commission attempts administratively to adopt per se rules, it will run up against precedents making clear that the antitrust laws do not abide such rules. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 6:06 am
Arizona v. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 4:33 pm
From Judge Mark Hornak's decision two weeks ago in Newman v. [read post]
12 Mar 2022, 4:23 pm
From Hiers v. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
Welton v. [read post]
