Search for: "Shoe v. Administrator, Va*"
Results 141 - 160
of 285
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2016, 1:56 pm
I agree that in retrospect, it would have been the sensible thing to do, but I have to put myself in the shoes of the lender in 2007-8 and look forward. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 10:43 pm
The same thought apply mutatis mutandis to paragraphs 49 to 51 and 77 of the judgment of 6 November 2014 in Vans v OHIM (Representation of a wavy line), T‑53/13, also invoked by K-Swiss. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 6:45 pm
The Roberts Court has ruled against tribal interests on numerous occasions, although admittedly the language and tenor of the decision last year in Michigan v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 9:04 pm
These latter results are consistent with the reality that the "law typically recognizes liability for breach of supervisory duty for those who afford child care in the shoes of parents" and with broader principles of tort law that permit recovery for breach of a duty voluntarily assumed. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:13 am
Sivit v. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 9:13 am
The employee worked for three months as an accounts receivable representative for a business that outsourced administrative duties for a variety of clients. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Today, for reasons both technological and political, there is an increasing divergence and growing conflict between U.S. and foreign laws that compel, and prohibit, production of data in response to governmental surveillance directives.[1][2] Major U.S. telecommunications and Internet providers[3] face escalating pressure from foreign governments, asserting foreign law, to require production of data stored by the providers in the United States, in ways that violate U.S. law.[4] At the… [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 3:29 pm
Post and Beam Equity Group, LLC v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 12:44 pm
We’re not yet done with Glossip v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
What the Cohen holding means is that, for trust interpretation purposes, the MassHealth program stands in the same shoes as a creditor of the settlor. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
What the Cohen holding means is that, for trust interpretation purposes, the MassHealth program stands in the same shoes as a creditor of the settlor. [read post]
2 May 2015, 6:22 am
The case, Spokeo v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
In the 1992 case of New York v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 6:46 pm
Davis v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 9:03 am
Weiss v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 9:58 am
Error and administrative burden in adjudicating parody. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm
Holt v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm
Holt v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 7:44 am
’ Thomas v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 3:13 am
Garcia v. [read post]
