Search for: "Short v. City of Birmingham"
Results 41 - 60
of 105
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2012, 1:45 am
Birmingham City Council v Abdulla & ors, heard 11 July 2012. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 3:05 am
” [John Kenneth Ross, Short Circuit, on Lewis v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 10:00 pm
The ordinary rules of precedent continue to apply and judges continue to be bound by Lambeth LBC v Kay and Doherty v Birmingham CC (Kay v Lambeth LBC at [43]–[44]; [50]; [62]; [121]; [175]; [178]; [213]) unless and until the Supreme Court rules otherwise. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
The action then shifted back to the House of Lords, who in Doherty v Birmingham CC [2009] 1 AC 367 (our note is here) reaffirmed the majority approach in Kay, although they crowbarred a bit more into gateway (b). [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
The action then shifted back to the House of Lords, who in Doherty v Birmingham CC [2009] 1 AC 367 (our note is here) reaffirmed the majority approach in Kay, although they crowbarred a bit more into gateway (b). [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 11:59 am
While detailed statistical evidence was not necessarily required (R (Burnip) v Birmingham City Council (2012) EWCA Civ 629), that was where it would be possible to infer a general disadvantage, or it was obvious. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 4:33 pm
At the Court of Appeal, the issue was whether the previous court of appeal judgment in Smith v Evans [2007] EWCA Civ 1318 (actually Smith v Buckland, but continually cited here as Evans) could be considered as still standing after the decisions in Doherty v Birmingham City Council [2008] UKHL 57 (our post on Doherty here). [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 12:28 pm
May I refer you to Birmingham City Council (Appellants) v Ali (FC) and others (FC) (Respondents) (2009) UKHL 36″. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:09 pm
Ms T argued that Birmingham City Council v Ali [2009] UKHL 36 supported this argument. [read post]
23 May 2017, 11:43 am
The quickest to file are the EEOC district offices in Kansas City, Little Rock, Oklahoma City, and Los Angeles. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 9:26 am
Ali v Birmingham CC.The Court of Appeal gave these arguments short shrift. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 9:26 am
Ali v Birmingham CC.The Court of Appeal gave these arguments short shrift. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 1:21 pm
The Court did not accept the claimant’s arguments that these passages of Lord Hope and Lady Hale in Birmingham v Ali did not apply to the grant of mandatory relief, or that they were limited to situations where suitability was disputed. [read post]
28 May 2008, 1:47 pm
Birmingham Board of Education (2005). [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 4:07 am
On the contrary, the Germans started employing new weapons of indiscriminate killing—V-1 and V-2 rockets. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 12:53 pm
The Court of Appeal reviewed the main authorities R v Hillingdon London Borough Council ex p Puhlhofer (1986) AC 484 (‘Puhlhofer‘), which concerned the interpretation of sections 1 and 4 of the Housing (Homeless Persons) Act 1977 (‘the 1977 Act’), R v Brent London Borough Council ex p Awua (1996) AC 55 (‘Awua‘), which concerned Part III of the 1985 Act, and Birmingham City Council v Ali [2009] UKHL 36; (2009) 1 WLR 1506… [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm
IPSO has published one ruling since our last Round Up: 05869-19 Begum V The Daily Mirror, 1 Accuracy (2018), 2 Privacy (2018), 6 Children (2018), Breach- sanction: publication of correction Recent Judgments On 8 April 2020 Warby J handed down judgment in Birmingham City Council v Afsar (No.4) [2020] EWHC 864 (QB). [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 7:07 am
The Reviewing Officer has failed to follow guidance that was given in Shala v Birmingham City Council (2008) HLR 8, to seek to resolve gulf of opinion between NowMedical and the treating physicians. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 1:30 pm
Teresa Ward v LB Hillingdon. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 12:30 pm
See Timbs v. [read post]
