Search for: "Short v. Murphy" Results 1 - 20 of 349
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2014, 3:22 am by Ben
So Ms Murphy herself could use the Greek service and her criminal conviction was overturned by the High Court.But neither CJEU nor the High Court directly resolved the wider issue of copyright infringement in those elements of the matches that could be protected by the Premier League - logos and graphics, the the league's anthem and pre-recorded and edited short films from earlier matches used in live broadcasts - and the CJEU noted that when these were shown in public - and… [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 5:59 pm
The Tax Court yesterday rejected a married couple's reliance on Murphy v. [read post]
22 Aug 2006, 9:11 pm
It is therefore refreshing to find a judicial opinion that actually applies conservative principles.Yesterday, in the case of Murphy v. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 7:50 pm by The Blog Team
In short, there was a “tremendous disconnect” between the forfeiture amount and the legally available fine. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 8:17 am by Brad Schnure
When their proposal was challenged, the New Jersey Supreme Court reaffirmed in Lance v. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 9:40 pm
This matter be listed at a callover of matters awaiting trial before Justice Murphy at 9.00am on a date to be advised or [specify date].2. [read post]
12 May 2010, 10:21 am by NL
Ahmed & Ors v Murphy [2010] EWHC 453 (Admin) This was an appeal to the High Court of a decision by the London Rent Assessment Committee (LRAC) that the maximum fair rent payable by Mr Murphy for the flat in Brick Lane, Spitalfields was £8.50 per week. [read post]
12 May 2010, 10:21 am by NL
Ahmed & Ors v Murphy [2010] EWHC 453 (Admin) This was an appeal to the High Court of a decision by the London Rent Assessment Committee (LRAC) that the maximum fair rent payable by Mr Murphy for the flat in Brick Lane, Spitalfields was £8.50 per week. [read post]
29 Dec 2006, 5:50 am
For it was last Friday that the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued an order vacating the judgment in Murphy v. [read post]