Search for: "Short v. Parker" Results 1 - 20 of 283
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2018, 4:40 am by Dennis Crouch
In 2012 I wrote a short essay on what I called “The Revival of Parker v. [read post]
11 Oct 2006, 11:23 am
Parker, 422 F. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 11:28 am by Eric Goldman
This is the initial interest confusion that Bart alleges; whether it may ultimately prove to be a mere distraction and therefore fall short of being actionable is not an issue that the Court can resolve on the pleadings alone. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 3:02 pm by JT
Rowe v Fisher, 2011 NY Slip Op 01721 (1st Dept. 2011) “The motion court properly precluded plaintiffs’ expert testimony on chelation because the expert’s theories were contrary to the medical literature on the subject and therefore “unreliable” (Parker v Mobile Oil Corp., 7 NY3d 434, 447 [2006]). [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 4:01 am
Twenty years later Judge Parker was on the panel that heard Briggs v. [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 6:35 am
Nov. 30, 2006) (Jacobs, Parker, Oberdorfer) (per curiam): This short opinion holds that convictions under (1) the second clause of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 2:37 am
Welcome, Kenneth Parker QC, to the High Court. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 3:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The court correctly determined that the complaint is devoid of allegations from which it could be inferred that any negligence by defendants in their handling of the family court proceeding was the “but for” causation of any damages (see Dweck Law Firm v Mann, 283 AD2d 292, 293 [1st Dept 2001]; see also Phillips-Smith Specialty Retail Group II v Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl, 265 AD2d 208, 210 [1st Dept 1999], lv denied 94 NY2d 759 [2000]). [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 8:59 am by David Smith
On utility payments the FTT had again not followed Parker v Waller. [read post]