Search for: "Shuck v. Shuck" Results 61 - 80 of 82
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2015, 10:01 pm by Cookson Beecher
Under the proposed rule, shucked oysters — those that are taken out of their shells — are exempt because, for the most part, they’re cooked before they’re eaten. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 1:59 am
Yes, even pre-shucked oysters still in the shell can realize food-safety and taste benefits, as well as extended shelf life, from HPP.Blue Seal Oysters from Nisbet Oyster Co., which has a 500-acre shellfish farm in Willapa Bay, Wash., are processed with HPP, promoted as "Fresher Under Pressure Technology. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 11:00 pm by Editor
On the bright side, this week, Law Shucks notes that some lawyers really are bargains at $1,000 an hour. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 11:00 pm by Editor
On the bright side, this week, Law Shucks notes that some lawyers really are bargains at $1,000 an hour. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 11:16 pm
The base configuration MacBook Air comes with a 1.86GHz processor and a 120GB hard drive, mono speakers, no FireWire, only one USB 2 port, and no optical drive (shucks, no watching Ark II DVDs in class). [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 7:28 am by Steve Hall
• The rule banning racially discriminatory use of peremptory strikes announced in Batson v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 9:53 am by Ken
Daddy briefly contemplated using Poppa’s V-8, and was spared Sophie’s choice between a vengeful father and a odoriferous dog by the fact that there was no V-8 left. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 8:17 am by David Lat
., some stained blue dresses.UPDATE: As noted in the comments, this move is reminiscent of Nelson v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 3:06 pm
Without a doubt, the most interesting oral argument so far, from a humor perspective anyway, was the one in FCC v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 6:15 pm by carie
Then, both sides can ask questions and take turns dismissing jurors using what are called peremptory strikes (the number of strikes varies by state, but it is often enough for one side to eliminate all qualified minorities).In a 1986 case, Batson v. [read post]
31 May 2010, 11:57 am by law shucks
And when it’s former-associate v. firm, that’s all the more interesting. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 2:59 am
The agency also announced a new goal: to eliminate V. vulnificus illnesses as fully as possible, thus replacing its old objective of reducing them by 60 percent. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 7:36 pm by Peter Tillers
 But such a defense of the debate about mathematical analysis of evidence is a bit like saying that WWII was a good thing because it led to the development of V-2 rockets. [read post]