Search for: "Sias v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 59
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2017, 4:13 am
Bras for the Cause Iowa, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 4:04 pm
To come back to the IPT, it applies the rulings in the judgement by the European Court of Human Right in Weber & Saravia v Germany [2008] and Kennedy v United Kingdom [2011] to solve issues 2 and 3 (Mention is also made of R E v United Kingdom [2016] and Szabo & Vissy v Hungary). [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 9:17 am
Introduction Judgment of the Supreme Court is handed down today in the case of Janah v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (“SSFCA”) and Libya, and Benkharbouche v SSFCA. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 4:36 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 3:48 am
Where section 12(1) of the SIA does not apply, the status quo of State immunity provided for in section 1 of the SIA must prevail. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:02 am
The 2008 Superior Court of Quebec decision in Teitelbaum v. 9093-8119 Quebec Inc. and the 1980 Ontario Supreme Court decision in Royal Bank of Canada v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 6:41 am
The Quebec Court of Appeal held that s. 3 of the SIA is a complete codification of state immunity and exceptions thereto: “[42] The Estate and some of the interveners invite us not to adopt the interpretation of s. 3(1) the SIA which the Court of Appeal for Ontario favoured in Bouzari v. [read post]
18 Oct 2022, 6:29 am
It then sets out legitimate aims for which such SIAs can be undertaken. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 7:10 am
This is because, in Nevsun’s argument, all or part of the alleged wrongs of which Nevsun is accused are secondary or derivative of the alleged liability of the State of Eritrea, a direct examination of which is prohibited by the SIA and the act of state doctrine. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm
One of the exceptions under SIA 78 is section 3(1)(a), which provides that sovereign states are not immune “as respects proceedings relating to a commercial transaction entered into by the State“. 2. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 6:36 am
In Maytag Corporation v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 8:57 am
” The SIA, s 1, sets down the general principle that a State is immune from the jurisdiction of the courts of the UK subject to certain exceptions, including those in SIA, s 10. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 5:00 am
See Koehl v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 4:28 pm
Note that there are two more cases pending Case C-746/18 H.K. v Prokurator (Opinion handed down by AG Pitruzzella 21 Jan 2020) as well as references from Germany from 2019 and Ireland from 2020. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 5:34 am
Sias v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 4:01 am
In a recent Saskatchewan case, Love v. [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 12:30 am
Plumtree Software v. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 7:10 am
This is because, in Nevsun’s argument, all or part of the alleged wrongs of which Nevsun is accused are secondary or derivative of the alleged liability of the State of Eritrea, a direct examination of which is prohibited by the SIA and the act of state doctrine. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 7:10 am
This is because, in Nevsun’s argument, all or part of the alleged wrongs of which Nevsun is accused are secondary or derivative of the alleged liability of the State of Eritrea, a direct examination of which is prohibited by the SIA and the act of state doctrine. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 7:20 am
If that turns out to the case then Illumina Cambridge Limited v Latvia MGI Tech SIA and others is a substantial judgment to mark this departure. [read post]
