Search for: "Sierra Club v. Chemical Handling Corp."
Results 1 - 20
of 21
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2008, 7:56 pm
Three conservation organizations, Southeast Alaska Conservation Council (SEACC), the Sierra Club and Lynn Canal Conservation, appealed the Corps’ decision. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:35 pm
Historically, the property had been the site of a chemical manufacturing plant operated by Maryland Chemical Company. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 8:57 am
Michigan v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
Under EPCRA, companies must also report both routine and accidental releases of toxic chemicals, as well as the maximum amount of any listed chemicals at the facility and the amount contained in wastes transferred off-site. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
The company operates a dry bulk material handling and storage operation at 475 N. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
December 21, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
21 Dec 2009, 10:57 am
— Imelda V. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 4:42 pm
— Imelda V. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
Click Here LAWSUITS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS FILED Sierra Club Sues Over Texas Power Plant. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
Army Corps of Engineers for another look. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
– David Cullen, Fleet Owner, May 7, 2010 Word of the deal reached between Navistar International Corp. and the U.S. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
UPS generates hazardous and non-hazardous solid waste at its Lenexa location as a result of ordinary breakage, leakage, and spillage from the approximate 400,000 packages that are handled at the facility each day, the agreement says. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
Click Here Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm
The company also failed to implement spill response plans, document spills and properly train employees for handling the material. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm
—Rick Callahan, The Associated Press, December 22, 2009 Duke Energy Corp. will spend about $93 million to settle clean air violations at a coal-fired power plant in southern Indiana where unauthorized changes significantly boosted air pollution, the federal government said Tuesday. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm
—Rick Callahan, The Associated Press, December 22, 2009 Duke Energy Corp. will spend about $93 million to settle clean air violations at a coal-fired power plant in southern Indiana where unauthorized changes significantly boosted air pollution, the federal government said Tuesday. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Click Here California Appeals Court Affirms Lower Court Holding in Goodrich v. [read post]
