Search for: "Sierra Club v. US Forest Service"
Results 1 - 20
of 65
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2023, 3:30 am
Angela Fernandez Sierra Club v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 1:15 pm
In particular, Sierra Club claimed that the Forest Service had failed to consider the plan's effects on the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness (BWCAW). [read post]
31 May 2011, 1:30 pm
Forest Service and related federal defendants (collectively the Forest Service) violated NEPA by failing to consider alternative actions using the same modeling techniques and management priorities, but the court rejected several other NEPA and NFMA claims. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 1:48 pm
In Sierra Club v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:22 pm
On June 16, 2017 – without seeking either rehearing in the First District Court of Appeal or review by the Supreme Court – losing appellants Sierra Club and Center for Biological Diversity filed a letter asking the Supreme Court to depublish the First District’s (Division 1) recent opinion in Sierra Club v. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 12:39 pm
Forest Service manages the surface of the ANF, the mineral rights in most of the ANF are privately owned. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:38 pm
District Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong said the “Ninth Circuit’s holding in [Sierra Club v.] [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 1:09 pm
Supreme Court decision, Sierra Club v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 7:23 am
Meanwhile, Judge Noonan issued a dissenting opinion for the reasons explained in his concurrencein Sierra Forest Legacy v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 1:48 pm
" [citing: Sierra Club v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 1:30 pm
Intervening Environmental Groups include the Biodiversity Conservation Alliance; Defenders of Wildlife; National Audubon Society; Natural Resources Defense Council; Pacific Rivers Council; Sierra Club; Wilderness Society; and Wyoming Outdoor Council. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 7:32 pm
EXCERPT: In short, we find Western Watersheds, 468 F.3d 1099, and Sierra Club v. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 8:20 pm
Dept. of the Navy, 898 F.2d 1410 (9th Cir. 1990) and Sierra Club v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 9:33 am
In this case involving the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness Act, Wilderness Watch, Sierra Club North Star Chapter, and Northeastern Minnesotans for Wilderness (collectively Wilderness Watch) brought suit against Abigail Kimbell, Chief of the United States Forest Service, and Ed Schafer, Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture (collectively Forest Service), alleging that the Forest Service's decision to… [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 1:24 pm
for Env't v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 8:55 am
<> Forest Legacy Program nomination applications available - MDNR announced that the application to nominate forest land -- to protect private forest lands from conversion to non-forest uses for enrollment in Michigan's Forest Legacy Program is available online. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 9:47 am
The Earth Island Institute, the Sierra Club and other conservation advocates thus did not get a chance to offer input when the Service planned to cut down timber and sell it, after a fire had burned a large area of the Sequoia National Forest in California. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 8:42 am
(Citing Sierra Club v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 12:24 am
" Sierra Club v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 9:10 pm
Harm to their members' recreational, or even their mere esthetic, interests in the National Forests will suffice to establish the requisite concrete and particularized injury, see Sierra Club v. [read post]
