Search for: "Sierra Club v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service"
Results 61 - 70
of 70
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
The appellate court concluded that there was substantial evidence of a fair argument of potential impacts because (1) a letter from California Department of Fish and Wildlife (“CDFW”) indicated that the studies relied upon were “outdated,” and (2) the most recent study was during a drought period, and CDFW recommended additional studies. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm
-based company that provides dairy products, warehousing, and distribution services. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm
-based company that provides dairy products, warehousing, and distribution services. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm
That appeal was dismissed Monday after both sides reached a compromise that, in part, calls for the BLM to consider impacts to cultural, wildlife and other resources when reviewing new lease sales. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
Sierra Club v. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Click Here California Appeals Court Affirms Lower Court Holding in Goodrich v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
The company has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $310,000, of which $155,000 will be paid to the United States and the other $155,000 to Virginia. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
Fish & Game Commission (1997) 16 Cal.4th 105; Health First v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 11:57 pm
Sierra Club v. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
Fish and Wildlife Service and the U.S. [read post]
