Search for: "Sierra v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 998
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2012, 1:33 pm by WIMS
On Petition for Review of a Final Action of the United States Environmental Protection Agency. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 8:27 am
The Sierra Club files a writ to stop a Wal-Mart store, and loses. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 9:24 am
The Federal plan, by necessity, is adequate because the plan is but a stricter version of the satisfactory emissions limits already applied by the Plant and implemented throughout the State of New Mexico. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 2:24 pm
United States, No. 98-419L (Court of Federal Claims, Jan. 23, 2009), a massive opinion (84 single-spaced pages) with what at first glance seems to delve into just about every regulatory takings theory known: temporary takings, categorical takings, partial takings, parcel-as-a-whole, Mahon, Penn Central, First English, Lucas, Tahoe-Sierra, Seiber, delay, and ripeness. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 3:12 pm
Making a formal pact with federal prosecutors has many advantages, as demonstrated in United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 12:39 pm by WIMS
Mukasey, 534 F.3d at 188 (quoting Council of Alternative Political Parties v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 12:57 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
If you don't immediately recognize his name just check the reports of decisions because you certainly know his cases, which include: Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 1:38 pm by WIMS
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 9:00 am
On April 24, 2018, the Pennsylvania Environmental Hearing Board issued a decision denying a Petition for Supersedeas filed by Center for Coalfield Justice and Sierra Club which had sought to enjoin Consol Pennsylvania Coal Company, LLC (“Consol”) from mining under a stream called Polen Run located in Ryerson Station State Park See Center for Coalfield Justice v. [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 11:33 am by Brian Shiffrin
In Illinois v Wardlow (528 US 119 [2000]), the United States Supreme Court, by a 5-4 vote, held that a person in a high crime area fleeing at the sight of police is, by itself, sufficient to create reasonable suspicion, under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]