Search for: "Silva v. Justice Court" Results 21 - 40 of 128
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2012, 11:00 pm
Commerce Clause Chief Justice John Marshall wrote almost two hundred years ago in Gibbons v. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 6:43 am by Ezra Rosser
The return of judicial discretion with the United Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 5:15 pm by Brian Shiffrin
We again decline "to disavow our holding in Walston . . . that imposes an affirmative obligation on a trial court to create a record of compliance under CPL 310.30 and O'Rama" (People v Silva, 24 NY3d 294, 300  [2014], rearg denied 24 N.Y.3d 1216 [2015]; see People v Parker, — NY3d — [decided today]). [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (De Silva & Anor) v The Commissioners for HMRC, heard 22 Jun 2017. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Miller & Ors v Ministory of Justice; O’Brien v Ministry of Justice; and Walker v Innospec Ltd & Ors, heard 8-9 Mar 2017. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 2:03 pm by Bartolus
Meanwhile, at the Court of First Instance, the following were appointed judges until August 31 2010: Mr Heikki Kanninen (replacing Ms Virpi Tiili) Mr Juraj Schwarcz (replacing Mr Daniel Šváby, now of the Court of Justice). [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 3:20 am by Editor
International Court of Justice (ICJ) Ahmadou Sadio Diallo (Republic of Guinea v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Black) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 31 Oct-1 Nov 2017. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Wednesday 12 July, the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in the case of O’Brien v Ministry of Justice. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 4:33 am
  Forfeiture by wrongdoing in a principle in the common law that was first recognized by the United States Supreme Court in Reynolds v. [read post]