Search for: "Silver v. Silver" Results 81 - 100 of 1,854
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2014, 11:24 am by Editorial Board
Ramos of the New York Supreme Court for the County of New York, Commercial Division entered an order dismissing an amended complaint brought by Phoenix Light SF Limited, Silver Elms CDO PLC, Silver Elms CDO II Limited, and Kleros Preferred Funding V PLC against Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 5:33 am
A “citizen action” challenging the State’s settlement of earlier litigation involving payment of damages by the State dismissed Santora v Silver, 20 Misc.3d 836, Modified and Affirmed, 61 A.D.3d 621, Motion to appeal denied, 13 N.Y.3d 704 This “citizen taxpayer action” pursuant to State Finance Law Section 123 et seq., sought money damages from Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver and his former chief legal counsel, James Michael Boxley for the… [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 1:18 pm by Daily Record Staff
Real property — Ownership dispute — Interpleader This appeal arises from the question of who owns 949 Selim Road in Silver Spring, Maryland, which is currently improved by a single bay auto repair shop. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 9:31 pm by John Steele
Abstract: In 2011, all hell broke loose when the law firm of King & Spalding (K&S) abandoned the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group (BLAG) in U.S. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:45 am by Paul Kirgis
On Thursday, April 26, 2012, Cardozo Law will hold a half-day conference on the scope and impact of AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 9:55 pm
Baker v Silver Oak Senior Living Mgmt Co, LC, ___F.3d___(8th Cir. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 7:31 am by Securites Lawprof
Here is the abstract: There has been significant academic buzz about Silver v. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 4:32 am
In Leone v Silver & Silver, LLP ; 2009 NY Slip Op 04204 ; Decided on May 26, 2009 Appellate Division, Second Department we see that merely settling a case does not deprive plaintiff of the right to sue the attorney, so long as the settlement was effectively compelled by the acts of the target attorney. [read post]