Search for: "Silverman v. Weil"
Results 1 - 5
of 5
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2021, 5:52 am
The cause of action alleging defamation failed because the challenged statements were absolutely privileged as a matter of law and cannot be the basis for a defamation action (see Ifantides v Wisniewski, 181 AD3d at 576; Weinstock v Sanders, 144 AD3d at 1021; Brady v Gaudelli, 137 AD3d at 952; El Jamal v Weil, 116 AD3d 732, 734 [2014]; Rabiea v Stein, 69 AD3d at 701). [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 3:56 am
To satisfy the pleading requirement for causation, a plaintiff must allege that “‘but for’ the attorney’s conduct [or nonfeasance], the client would have prevailed in the underlying action or would not have sustained any ascertainable damages” ( Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP v Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc., 10 AD3d 267, 272 [1st Dept 2004]; Cosmetics Plus Group, Ltd. v Traub, 105 AD3d 134, 140-141 [1st Dept 2013]). [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 4:40 am
http://bit.ly/nWotnF (Jeffrey Klein, Nicolas Pappas) ECPA Protects Non-Citizen Communications Stored in the US – Suzlon Energy v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 4:40 am
http://bit.ly/nWotnF (Jeffrey Klein, Nicolas Pappas) ECPA Protects Non-Citizen Communications Stored in the US – Suzlon Energy v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 4:59 am
http://bit.ly/nWotnF (Jeffrey Klein, Nicolas Pappas) ECPA Protects Non-Citizen Communications Stored in the US – Suzlon Energy v. [read post]
