Search for: "Simmers v. Simmers"
Results 61 - 80
of 202
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2023, 5:55 am
Sackett v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 12:01 am
Booher v. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 4:13 am
Briefly: At Lawfare, Steve Vladeck discusses Hernandez v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 6:32 pm
The case, 303 Creative v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 6:00 am
The case of United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 8:49 am
Up until yesterday, the biggest green building dispute I had come across was Shaw Development v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 8:49 am
Up until yesterday, the biggest green building dispute I had come across was Shaw Development v. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 6:48 am
Thanks to this effective article in the Baltimore Sun, I see the Fourth Circuit last week in an unpublished opinion, US v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 2:37 pm
We have known since the Federal Circuit's decision in Bowers v. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 11:57 am
Supreme Court case of Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2015, 8:54 am
The debate over the usefulness of the “best interests of the child” test for determining custody has been simmering for a decade or more. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 2:48 pm
This seems particularly relevant given the general feeling that the UK is implementing EC DP law at the minimum or below : see the EU's continuing efforts to persuade the UK to buck up over Phorm, not to mention long-simmering confusion or dismay over (a) Durant v FSA and (b) relatedly, our lack of sync with the Art 29 WP as to when and if to treat IP addresses as personal data.It also of course means the UK remains unbound, at least in theory, by Article 36 of the Charter of… [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 7:53 am
Robert Chesney provided us with another Apple v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 11:40 pm
In the County of Maui, Hawaii v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 11:40 pm
In the County of Maui, Hawaii v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 5:08 am
That’s the primary message from the Second Circuit’s opinion in Lundy v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 8:25 am
The lack of consensus concerning the legal standards of submarine espionage, combined with a lack of operational naval acumen and simmering maritime rivalries, raises the risks of conflict. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 4:29 am
At Real Clear Policy, Nathan Chapman argues that Justice Neil Gorsuch’s separate concurrence in Sessions v. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 12:10 pm
The New York Court of Appeals – the state’s highest court -is about to consider an important property rights case, Goldstein v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 5:07 am
News that the five male Justices who voted in favor of the challengers in Burwell v. [read post]
