Search for: "Simmons v. District of Columbia" Results 1 - 20 of 29
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2009, 6:30 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Simmons equation really grows out of an earlier Second Circuit attorneys' fees case, Arbor Hill v. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 4:01 pm by Scott Limmer
 Since Miller, over two dozen states and the District of Columbia amended their juvenile sentencing laws convicted of homicide. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 4:01 pm by Scott Limmer
 Since Miller, over two dozen states and the District of Columbia amended their juvenile sentencing laws convicted of homicide. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 7:16 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Suppose President Obama wins all of the electoral votes from (1) all of the Northeastern states except New Hampshire; (2) Maryland, Delaware, the District of Columbia, and Virginia; (3) all of the states that border on the Pacific Ocean except Alaska; and (4) New Mexico, Colorado, Minnesota, Illinois, and Michigan. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 6:26 pm
Forty-three states, the District of Columbia, and the federal government have set the maximum punishment for juvenile offenders at life without the possibility of parole. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 11:47 am by Kedar
Marion County – Denied 18-Mar District of Columbia v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 2:00 pm
Simmons testified that `the pattern is consistent with animal bites. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 2:33 pm by Lovechilde
  The vast majority of jurisdictions nationwide (32 states and the District of Columbia) have never sentenced a child aged 13 or 14 to a life sentence without the possibility of parole. [read post]
19 May 2010, 3:51 am by Russ Bensing
The “count the legislatures” approach may be a problem here, too, because 37 states and the District of Columbia allow LWOP sentences for juveniles. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 12:16 pm by Erin Miller
Simmons (2005) and Atkins v. [read post]
25 May 2009, 5:18 pm
Trustees of Columbia Univ., 816 N.Y.S. 2d 695 (2006) (successor liability imposed against purchaser of assets free and clear of claims in bankruptcy proceeding); Simmons v. [read post]