Search for: "Simmons v. South Carolina" Results 1 - 20 of 56
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2023, 9:09 pm by Ilana Korchia
Products subject to this recall include: Simply NatureOrganic Strawberries24 oz.40991002562226/14/2024Arizona,Arkansas,California,Illinois,Iowa,Michigan,Minnesota,Missouri,North Dakota,Ohio,South Dakota,WisconsinVital ChoiceOrganic Strawberries16 oz.8342970050245/20/2024WashingtonKirkland SignatureOrganic Strawberries4 lbs.9661914040410/8/2024Alaska,Idaho,Montana,Oregon,Utah,WashingtonMade WithOrganic Strawberries10 oz.81434302139011/20/2024Illinois,MarylandPCC Community MarketsOrganic… [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 8:51 am by DONALD SCARINCI
South Carolina, 512 U.S. 154 (1994), which requires states to inform juries whether a capital defendant will be eligible for release if they are not sentenced to death. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 3:42 pm by Alexis Hoag-Fordjour
South Carolina, which held that jurors must receive such information to rebut an inference that the defendant posed a danger in the future. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 4:09 am by Bill Marler
Products are being removed from New World, Pak’n Save and Four Square shops nationwide, and from Trents and Raeward Fresh stores in the South Island. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 10:49 am by Amy Howe
South Carolina applies to Arizona, also applies to cases that are pending on collateral review. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 1:11 pm by Andrew Hamm
Arizona — confirming that the rule announced in Simmons v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 9:05 pm by Max Masuda-Farkas
Department of Energy reached a historic settlement with the state of South Carolina to remove 9.5 metric tons of weapons-grade plutonium from a Cold War-era site in South Carolina by 2037 and to make an upfront payment to the state of $600 million. [read post]
16 May 2018, 5:00 pm by Aurora Barnes
South Carolina and its progeny; and (2) whether Simmons applies in a sentencing proceeding for capital murder committed by a defendant already in prison, a context demonstrating that incarceration is not a sufficient means of preventing future violence by that defendant. [read post]