Search for: "Simms v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 89
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2018, 3:28 am by Edith Roberts
” At EarthJustice, Patrice Simms outlines what Kavanaugh’s nomination “means for the future of environmental protections. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 6:43 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Closing argument by state — Diverting focus from evidence Jamal Simms, appellant, was convicted in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City of first-degree rape, three counts of first-degree sexual offense, third-degree sexual offense, second-degree assault, first-degree burglary, carrying a dangerous weapon openly with the intent to injure, and theft between $1,000 and ... [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 8:06 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Closing argument by state — Preservation of claim Appellant, Charles Edward Simms, was tried and convicted of first-degree murder by a jury in the Circuit Court for Wicomico County (Beckstead, J.), on March 27, 2017. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 6:46 am by ASAD KHAN
Applying Simms [1999] UKHL 33, he found that general or ambiguous statutory words are incapable of overriding fundamental rights. [read post]
8 May 2017, 8:19 am by Laura Davis, AFPD, FDSET
United States, 15-6060, the right to counsel pre-indictment case, in the morning, and United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 10:52 am by pscamp01
William Simms was a former state representative who was the candidate of the Democratic Party, which is sometimes referred to as the Democracy here. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 4:51 am by Cecilia Marcela Bailliet
Zero Dark Thirty: International Law, Torture and Representation Daniel Joyce and Gabrielle Simm 29. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
  Lord Toulson noted the frequently quoted words of Lord Hoffmann in R v Secretary of State for the Home Office, Ex p Simms ([2000] 2 AC 115) that “Fundamental rights cannot be overridden by general or ambiguous words” and said importantly that “while Lord Hoffmann said that this presumption will apply “even” to the most general words, but I would say further that the more general the words, the harder it is likely to be to… [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:09 am by Dan Tench
  Lord Toulson noted the frequently quoted words of Lord Hoffmann in R v Secretary of State for the Home Office, Ex p Simms [2000] 2 AC 115 that “Fundamental rights cannot be overridden by general or ambiguous words” and said importantly that “while Lord Hoffmann said that this presumption will apply “even” to the most general words, but I would say further that the more general the words, the harder it is likely to be to rebut the… [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 7:19 am by Joy Waltemath
Accordingly, a nonunion job seeker was lawfully denied a referral because he refused to pay the fee charged by a union to use its exclusive hiring hall, the appeals court held, affirming the district court’s dismissal of his suit contending the fee was unlawful (Simms v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 6:03 am
The case of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea Hague International Tribunals: International Court of Justice Juliette Mcintyre, The Declaratory Judgment in Recent Jurisprudence of the ICJ: Conflicting Approaches to State Responsibility? [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 1:33 pm by Steven Boutwell
§9:4831(C). [6] Simms Hardin Co., LLC v. 3901 Ridgelake Drive, L.L.C., 12-469 (La. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 7:13 am by Farrah Nagrampa
Sachs, in which the court will determine when an entity is an “agent” of a “foreign state” under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, and Ocasio v. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 5:34 pm
Since the IRS is not a party to this proceeding and in any event would not be bound by any determination of this court under Commissioner v. [read post]