Search for: "Simon v. Craft"
Results 21 - 40
of 53
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2017, 11:00 am
Admittedly, French existentialism is sometimes little more than navel-gazing with bad breath, but Camus at his best is incandescent (and, at his worst, is far better than Stalinist puppets like Jean-Paul Sartre and Simone de Beauvoir). [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 11:52 am
I am happy to announce the publication of my article: "A Lex Mercatoria for Corporate Social Responsibility Codes Without the State? [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 9:39 am
Simon (a former Warren law clerk) has written that “Warren was not a great judge under traditional standards used to assess judicial stature, because he was neither especially skilled nor interested in legal craft or theory. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 5:30 am
On the one hand, it is difficult to toss Roberts’ carefully crafted interpretive catechism off as flippant rhetoric. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 9:41 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 2:57 pm
See United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 3:56 am
Never too late 41 [week ending on Sunday 12 April] – Nagoya Protocol for dummies | The IPKat and his friends | Actial Farmaceutica Lda v Claudio de Simone | Article 5(5) of the EU's Trade Mark Directive 2008/95 | Article 16(3) of our beloved TRIPS | Italy v Spain in copyright enforcement online. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 4:00 am
We all have likely experienced the satisfaction of reading a well-crafted decision. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 7:51 am
Rumsfeld, Rumsfeld v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
The 2006 RFRA Decision Holding That a Small Religious Group Has Rights to Use an Untested and Illegal Drug In 2006, in its first and only RFRA decision on the merits to date, the Supreme Court held in Gonzales v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 6:19 am
In the famous House of Lords case, Hensher v Restawile [1976] AC 64, Lord Simon discusses this point, noting that even Morris himself “acknowledged that the machine could be useful in extinguishing all irksome and unintelligent labour, leaving us free to raise the standard of skill of hand and energy of mind of our workmen. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm
Simon.Stahl, Philip Michael.Chicago, Illinois : ABA Section of Family Law, [2013]KF547 .S733 2013 Family Law According to our hearts : Rhinelander v. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 12:42 pm
After Glik, and after Boston ended up paying $170,000 to Glik and his attorneys, the Seventh Circuit decided a case along similar lines in ACLU v. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 12:39 pm
In a complex medical negligence case, Cojocaru v. [read post]
24 May 2013, 9:09 am
It is a complaint not about sufficiency, but about process, and stands to be resolved on the basis of the core analysis in Teskey [R. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
The decision by Justice O’Donnell in R. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 7:38 am
Coyle recounts how a smart group of conservative lawyers has crafted cases with an eye towards an increasingly receptive conservative majority. [read post]
30 May 2012, 8:21 am
It was this freedom of contract that Lochner v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 3:32 pm
Below the fold you can find Simon’s description of the amicus brief. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
(United States v. [read post]
