Search for: "Simonds v. Simonds"
Results 1 - 10
of 10
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2015, 3:11 am
Simonds (D. [read post]
1 May 2021, 5:15 pm
Author SimonDes Licence CC BY-SA 4.0 Source Wikimedia Commons Jane LambertPatents Court (Mr Justice Meade) Philip Morris Products, SA and another v RAI Strategic Holdings, Inc and another [2021] EWHC 537 (Pat) (9 March 2021)This was an action for revocation of European Patent (UK) 3 398 460 B1 ("460") and European Patent (UK) 3 491 944 B1("944") and a counterclaim for infringement by the products [read post]
13 Oct 2003, 2:48 pm
Simonds v Isle of Wight Council (2003)QBD Playing fields could not be made free of all hazards and because a school had diagnosed a hazard did not mean it was duty bound to take further steps to make access or use impossible. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 10:12 am
United States Posted by Trisha Simonds [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 11:30 am
District Board, Shahjahanapur, [1952] 1 SCR 122) that is quite similar to Inco, the Supreme Court followed Lord Simonds' approach. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 2:42 pm
Their colour and their contents are to be derived from their context [See similar observations of Viscount Simonds in Attorney General v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 8:01 am
The case is Commonwealth v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:44 am
This is the text of a Keynote address given by Sir James Munby, President of the Family Division at the Law Society’s Family Law Annual Conference ‘The sacred and the secular: religion, culture and the family courts’ on London 29 October 2013 (H/t to Adam Wagner) Only a little over a century ago, in 1905, a judge in a family case could confidently opine that the function of the judges was “to promote virtue and morality and to discourage… [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 4:47 pm
Lord Kitchin considered that this conclusion found support in Government of India v Taylor, where Viscount Simonds (at 508) had explained that the meaning of “liabilities” in s 302 of the Companies Act 1948 excluded obligations that were not enforceable in the English courts. [read post]
4 May 2011, 10:18 am
The Supreme Court in Surya Dev Rai v. [read post]
