Search for: "Simply Right Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 8,162
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2024, 7:41 am
Nealy alleged that he held the copyrights to Music Specialist’s songs and that Warner Chappell’s licensing activities infringed his rights. [read post]
15 May 2024, 3:00 am
Owner Douglas Emmett Inc., meanwhile, sees the case as a test of protections for landlords, who, it says, shouldn’t be forced to rent units they don’t want to rent. [read post]
15 May 2024, 2:00 am
For any given city or county, simply conflicting with state laws is sufficient for the local ordinance to be invalidated. [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:05 pm
Raimondo and Relentless, Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
A court cannot examine the merits of an arbitration award [*2]and substitute its judgment for that of the arbitrator simply because it believes its interpretation would be the better one. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
A court cannot examine the merits of an arbitration award [*2]and substitute its judgment for that of the arbitrator simply because it believes its interpretation would be the better one. [read post]
7 May 2024, 12:30 pm
The two distributors owned the rights in certain parts of Connecticut to distribute the company’s products to store accounts and their own customers. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:20 am
Harvie Wilkinson's concurrence made the argument against one-sided pseudonymity in at least many such cases: I appreciate especially [the majority's] recognition of the potential for pseudonymous litigation to "undermine[] the public's right of access to judicial proceedings" and how "disclosing the parties' identities furthers openness of judicial proceedings. [read post]
6 May 2024, 4:00 am
As a preliminary matter, it's simply not true that the term is inconsistent with believing that there should be a right to abortion. [read post]
6 May 2024, 3:32 am
As Delaware Vice Chancellor Slights colorfully remarked in In re PetSmart, Inc., “Garbage In; Garbage Out” (CV 10782-VCS, 2017 WL 2303599, at *32 [Del Ch May 26, 2017]; Ramcell, Inc. v Alltel Corp., 2019-0601-PAF, 2022 WL 16549259, at *11 (Del Ch Oct. 31, 2022) (“Without a reliable estimate of cash flows, a DCF analysis is simply a guess. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:11 am
Harvie Wilkinson's concurrence made the argument against one-sided pseudonymity in at least many such cases: I appreciate especially [the majority's] recognition of the potential for pseudonymous litigation to "undermine[] the public's right of access to judicial proceedings" and how "disclosing the parties' identities furthers openness of judicial proceedings. [read post]
2 May 2024, 2:27 pm
The “Inc. [read post]
2 May 2024, 1:20 pm
Supply, Inc., 2017 IL App (5th) 150117-U, ¶¶ 42-46 The specific conduct that courts have found to be oppressive varies. [read post]
2 May 2024, 12:47 pm
., Inc., 241 B.R. 247 (Bankr. [read post]
1 May 2024, 9:01 pm
Such expressive activities—speech-motivated threats, batteries, and the like—are simply not protected expression within the meaning of the First Amendment (just as defamation is not protected expression). [read post]
1 May 2024, 12:08 pm
Ethicon, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
” If Egilman’s challenge to the trial judge was not bizarre enough, Egilman also claimed a right to intervene in the appeal by advancing the claim that the Rule 702 exclusion hurt his livelihood. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 12:16 pm
MONDELEZ INTERNATIONAL, INC., Dist. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 9:14 am
Am., Inc., No. 23-1052 (U.S. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 8:23 am
Facebook, Inc., 2024 WL 1693355 (9th Cir. [read post]
