Search for: "Simply Wireless, Inc. v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al"
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2010, 12:25 pm
Monday, the Supreme Court will hear one hour of oral argument in City of Ontario, et al., v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:46 am
Texas (08-1438), limited to the following question: whether an individual may sue a state or state official in his official capacity for damages for violations of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 6:47 am
(all) Amicus brief of the Cato Institute et al. (09-988) Amicus brief of eight states (09-991) Title: PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 2:55 pm
Their October 27, 2009 decision, Jennifer Laster, et al. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 1:40 pm
“At what point do we simply say . . . this statute is an ill fit for current technology? [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:00 am
Chennai Live 104.8 FM asks the Madras High Court: Indian Performing Rights Society Ltd & Ors v Branch Manager, Muthoot Finance Private Limited, Chennai & Ors (Spicy IP) Bombay High Court: Use of inventions for government purposes: Garware Wall Ropes v A I Chopra Engineers & Contractors, Konkan Railway Corporation (IP Frontline) Beware Mumbaikers: The Slumlord’s Act could detain you for a year for simply buying a pirated DVD (Spicy… [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 5:15 pm
Motorola Mobility, Inc., 886 F.Supp.2d 1061 (W.D. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 7:38 am
What exposes his permissive agenda is the passage on page 28 in which he disagrees with Judge Posner, or at least with the way he, I believe, misunderstands Judge Posner:"Some commentators and some courts reason that -- as a matter of contract -- the F/RAND commitment is an agreement that damages are adequate compensation for infringement and therefore an injunction should not be granted under the Supreme Court's standard in eBay Inc. et al. v. [read post]
