Search for: "Simpson v. Grant"
Results 21 - 40
of 349
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Nov 2021, 8:33 am
Sewell v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 4:43 am
Simpson. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 7:52 am
Simpson Strong-Tie Co. v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 11:37 am
Seventy-five years ago in Simpson v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 12:44 pm
Simpson. [read post]
6 May 2009, 4:53 pm
Simpson in 11 factoring cases consolidated for appeal as "Henderson v. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 10:01 pm
;o) In Simpson v. [read post]
5 May 2008, 1:45 am
Simpson Strong-Tie Co., Inc. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 5:49 am
State v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 3:11 am
"Where evidentiary material is submitted on a CPLR 3211(a)(7) motion, it may be considered by the court, but unless the defendant demonstrates, without significant dispute, that a material fact alleged by the complaint is not a fact at all, the motion will not be granted" (Quesada v Global Land, Inc., 35 AD3d 575, 576; see Caravousanos v Kings County Hosp., 74 AD3d 716). [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:49 am
"Where evidentiary material is submitted on a CPLR 3211(a)(7) motion, it may be considered by the court, but unless the defendant demonstrates, without significant dispute, that a material fact alleged by the complaint is not a fact at all, the motion will not be granted" (Quesada v Global Land, Inc., 35 AD3d 575, 576; see Caravousanos v Kings County Hosp., 74 AD3d 716). [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 6:42 am
Facts: This case (Shaw v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 4:01 am
In Kata v Westminster CC [2011] EWCA Civ 1456 and Simpson-Lowe v Croydon BC [2012] EWCA Civ 131 (neither are on baili or westlaw, but are on Lexis; Kata is noted in February's Legal Action at p 13), permissions to appeal not vulnerable s 202 homelessness reviews, upheld by the county court, were refused by the CA. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 4:01 am
In Kata v Westminster CC [2011] EWCA Civ 1456 and Simpson-Lowe v Croydon BC [2012] EWCA Civ 131 (neither are on baili or westlaw, but are on Lexis; Kata is noted in February's Legal Action at p 13), permissions to appeal not vulnerable s 202 homelessness reviews, upheld by the county court, were refused by the CA. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 1:11 pm
F.B. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 4:27 am
Christopher Clarke LJ granted permission only in relation to the latter. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 8:09 am
The Second Circuit today in US v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 2:00 am
The following is an excerpt from the June 2012 edition of the Alert: This month’s Alert discusses the Supreme Court’s grant of certiorari in Amgen, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 2:00 am
The following is an excerpt from the June 2012 edition of the Alert: This month’s Alert discusses the Supreme Court’s grant of certiorari in Amgen, Inc. v. [read post]
