Search for: "Simpson v. Standard Container Co."
Results 1 - 20
of 39
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2023, 1:35 pm
Simpson Strong-Tie Co. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 5:18 pm
The case went to trial on May 12, 1969 and the verdict came back in favor of the defendants. 1969 – Borel v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm
Free speech rights in the Irish Constitution 2.1 The freedom of political expression The right “to express freely … convictions and opinions” contained in Article 40.6.1(i) of the Constitution is now understood, broadly speaking, as a freedom of political expression, concerned with the public activities of citizens in a democratic society (see Murphy v Irish Radio and Television Commission [1999] 1 IR 12, 24, [1998] 2 ILRM 360, 372, (28 May 1998)… [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 3:31 pm
King v. [read post]
27 Feb 2021, 5:01 am
"] From Wagner v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 5:35 am
[Simpson v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 6:03 am
Posted by David Katz and Sabastian V. [read post]
19 Oct 2019, 9:37 am
KGAA v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 11:37 am
Seventy-five years ago in Simpson v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am
It started with this quote from Bill Gates, Microsoft’s co-founder: It’s always surprising how old concepts carry into the new medium. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm
The Social Media Law Bulletin notes that the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement (“USMCA”) contains a provision (Article 19.17) relating to intermediary liability – forbidding intermediaries from being hel to the same standards as publishers. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 2:00 pm
Supreme Court will hear arguments in South Dakota v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 1:08 pm
Michael Simpson (R-ID); Rep. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 1:08 pm
Michael Simpson (R-ID); Rep. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 6:04 am
Lobrano, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, on Saturday, January 28, 2017 Tags: Bankruptcy, Bondholders, Debt, Debtor-creditor law, Distressed companies, Foreclosures, Restructurings, Securities regulation, Trust Indenture Act, U.S. federal courts The Spotlight on Boards 2017 Posted by Martin Lipton and Sabastian V. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm
In Roach v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 5:31 am
"Simpson & Marwick – now Clyde & Co are known to have acted as agents for the Law Society of Scotland’s Master Insurance Policy. [read post]
20 May 2016, 6:45 am
McLaughlin and Yafit Cohn, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, on Friday, May 13, 2016 Tags: Acquisition agreements, Contracts, Corporate fraud, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Due diligence, Fair values,Fairness review, Liability standards, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Reliance Genuine Parts Co. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:13 am
W/o harmonization, standards for advertising were different—protection very strict in Germany, 10-15% misled = sufficient for misleading. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
April 7, 2011); Simpson v. [read post]
