Search for: "Sinclair v. State of California" Results 1 - 20 of 27
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2011, 12:13 am by johntfloyd
Extended Border Search Doctrine: Suspicionless Searches of Computers and Cameras Need not be Conducted at Time and Place of Entry By: Houston Criminal Lawyer John Floyd and Paralegal Billy Sinclair It was a case of “first impression” for the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals—the case of United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
” In response, Sinclair spokesperson Ronn Torossian reportedly stated that they were “prepared to resolve any perceived issues and look forward to finalizing our acquisition of Tribune Media. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 5:26 pm by INFORRM
All the states except Virginia and Maine are supporting the appeal. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 9:02 pm by Josephine A. Phillips
IN THE NEWS California Governor Gavin Newsom signed two bills into law banning people from carrying firearms in public places and raising taxes on guns and ammunition sold in the state. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:31 pm by Rick Hasen
Lane, 66 Ohio State Law Journal 177 (2005) The California Recall Punch Card Litigation: Why Bush v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
Pending Bills California’s financial climate risk disclosure bill, known as the Climate-Related Financial Risk Act (SB 261), passed the State Senate on May 30 with a vote of 27-8 and is now before the state Assembly.[13] It would require covered businesses with annual gross revenues of more than $500 million to prepare and make public a “climate-related financial risk report disclosing the entity’s climate-related financial risk and measures adopted to… [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 10:20 am by kblocher@hslf.org
Supreme Court is considering its ruling in National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 1:00 pm
So the same lawyers, switching nominal plaintiffs, take a third bite at the apple in California state court. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
So medical monitoring in California doesn't appear to be a completely independent cause of action. [read post]