Search for: "Singh, et al v. Holder"
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2017, 10:02 am
Don Koprivec et al. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 5:44 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondents in Shelby County v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 7:38 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in Shelby County v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 9:01 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.] [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 5:46 am
Holder, and Fisher v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:08 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondents in Shelby County v. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:49 pm
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.Issue: Whether Congress’ decision in 2006 to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 4:46 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.Issue: Whether Congress’ decision in 2006 to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 8:03 pm
Blazed SKLO Podebrady S.I.O. et al v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 11:38 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.Issue: Whether Congress’ decision in 2006 to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 11:39 pm
-Dallas 2012, no pet.); Singh v. [read post]
