Search for: "Skidmore v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 214
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2007, 5:57 am
Here is the abstract:This Article offers a comprehensive examination of the Skidmore standard for judicial review of agency legal interpretations as applied by the courts in the period since the Supreme Court revitalized Skidmore in United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 12:53 pm by Guest Author
The amicus brief argues that, in “the guise of giving Skidmore ‘respect’ to a precedential statutory-interpretation decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”),” the panel decision in Lopez v. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 6:46 am by Hayleigh Bosher
 The Appeal Court stated, however, that Jury Instruction No. 16 correctly listed non-protectable musical building blocks that no individual may own, and did not, as Skidmore claimed, exclude the particular use of musical elements in an original expression.Clarifying the tests for infringement and non-protectable elements of music could be a welcomed relief to the growing number of cases where similar songs are found to have been infringing. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 10:30 am by Paul Caron
Hickman (Minnesota) has filed an amicus brief in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Thomas Merrill
This imports the sequencing familiar in the Chevron context from United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:32 am by Guest Author
This was the position clearly taken by the Court in 1940, in United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 9:44 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Rev. 1235, 1303 (2007); Pierce, Democratizing the Administrative State, 48 Wm. [read post]